Jacob Kramer-Duffield
@jaykaydee.bsky.social
4K followers 1.7K following 7.8K posts
Consulting on audience strategy, audiostrategy.org Writing a book for @beltpublishing.bsky.social Teaching digital sociability and ethics, NYU-Tandon ACT-UAW Local 7902 Ph.D., UNC-SILS Fmr audience data WNYC, NYMag, Megaphone jkd.10 on Signal Enjoys birds
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Since I am apparently on a starter pack or something: hello! I'm JKD. I have been bopping around the Internet for a long time, used to work in politics, got my Ph.D. studying digital identity, worked in-house in media on analytics and audience, and now consult on that and teach about Online. (1/n)
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Yes and I'm saying you actually need to think about how you want to have that happen! Who determines what's garbage? What are the mechanisms? Are we seizing control of the domestic and international supply chain? Who is "we" here?
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Specifically how do you propose to do that? To determine who's a good and bad person?
jaykaydee.bsky.social
What policy or sets of policies do you think could accomplish this goal?
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Also absolutely amazing to say with a straight face, in 2025, "you can't stop progress." Dunno man, sure seems like you can!
hypervisible.blacksky.app
From the tech bro gospel: “someone was going to coarsen society and further immiserate people, it may as well be me.”
"We're already at the point where we can't tell what's real and what's not online, and OpenAI and other tech companies will have to solve around that," said the former OpenAI engineer, using tech lingo for finding a solution to a problem. "But that's not an argument for not trying to dominate this market. You can't stop progress. If OpenAI didn't release Sora, someone else would have."

In fact, Meta is also trying to, with its recent introduction of Vibes, a platform where people can make and share short AI-generated deepfakes. In July, Google introduced Veo 3, an AI video tool. But it wasn't until OpenAI's release of the Sora app that personalized AI slop really took off.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
This is all correct but we shouldn't underrate the opportunity cost of a billionaire hoarding wealth vs. that money being in, e.g., a credit union. The multiplier of the latter is MUCH bigger - and across all the ultra-wealthy, that is a lot of lost economic potential.
johnrogers.bsky.social
A billion dollars is the socio-political equivalent of a loose nuke, and we should work as ruthlessly and diligently to prevent the acquisition of the former as we do the latter.
liberalcurrents.com
“The problem with billionaires isn’t that they’re hoarding money that would otherwise pay for a Scandinavian social utopia. It’s that their money has become a source of wildly distorted political power that allows a few men with extremist views to wreak havoc on the rest of us.”
jaykaydee.bsky.social
He's just not very good at running campaigns!
jaykaydee.bsky.social
One thing of many: if your across-the-street neighbor has a Ring, your comings and goings to your own house - or inside of it unless you draw the curtains - will now be monitored.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
By their new boss who has no idea what like 90% of them do because she's never worked in any of television, news, or television news, no less.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Definitely go see it! I did so this week and it was just tremendous.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Always always hate that call.
Reposted by Jacob Kramer-Duffield
allergyphd.bsky.social
The number of times I've heard that what education is has to change because AI! When people say this to me now, I just say, "no." Usually they stop talking for ten seconds because no one is ever telling them no, and that's the whole problem
tedmccormick.bsky.social
The basic structure of so much commentary, some in the guise of academic study, reduces to:

(1) generative AI products are detrimental to the goals of education

(2) therefore, the goals of education must change.

Without the tacit axiom that AI has authority behind it, that just doesn’t follow.
Reposted by Jacob Kramer-Duffield
jaykaydee.bsky.social
in rethinking institutional design questions, "make hearing SCOTUS cases as annoying as possible so they don't really take very many" is I think an underrated consideration. Congress needs to do stuff again (we need to fix that too! but still).
jaykaydee.bsky.social
idk, I kind of admire this. Almost no big tech company has made the bet that their product is valuable enough for users to actually pay for, and so have all become horrifying data surveillance/advertising platforms. If Snap thinks they can make a go of a different route, that's something!
jaykaydee.bsky.social
reading between the lines of this piece makes me actually less sure that there's a deal that comes together here.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
hey that's not fair - they also make pictures of Spongebob doing 9/11
jaykaydee.bsky.social
"You have elected to take a job where the primary purpose is for you to eat shit and own the death of broadcast TV news, a thing that is going to die no matter what you do. Nice work!"

Read this whole thing, one of the best and most succinct analyses of our current media ecosystem.
jaykaydee.bsky.social
Jamelle Bouie's video work is the first thing that comes to mind