Danya Glabau
@allergyphd.bsky.social
3.8K followers 1.3K following 1.9K posts
STS and Medical Anthropology, cyborgs, care, feminist theories of tech, faculty NYU Tandon, BISR faculty, she/her CYBORG: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262547550/cyborg/ Food Allergy Advocacy: https://www.upress.umn.edu/9781517910563/food-allergy-advoca
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
allergyphd.bsky.social
*taps the sign*
allergyphd.bsky.social
No we are talking about deskilling and firing people, the AI industry default setting
allergyphd.bsky.social
So many takes on this man and his various escapades that entirely miss the point of why it is all bad, it's exhausting!
allergyphd.bsky.social
As a feminist STS anthropologist, I fully endorse this take
danhicks.bsky.social
*sighs in philosopher of science*

Looking for confirmatory evidence is an entirely normal part of science. The primary problem here is the eugenics and the fascism, not the lies to children about "the scientific method."
One Bluesky account is quoting another. Inner post has a video of RFK Jr., some person I don't recognize (Tylenol and autism guy, maybe?), Marco Rubio (I think), and Trump. Post text: "RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: 'It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof." 

Outer post text: "We're doing studies to prove it (* not how studies work)"
allergyphd.bsky.social
"In Defense of Science Illiteracy" is a section header in this book, Bluesky would hate it SO much
Reposted by Danya Glabau
shannonmattern.bsky.social
I encountered this in one of my NYU newsletters; includes lots of zoom events!
NYU Detention and Deportation event series; use QR code to access full info
allergyphd.bsky.social
Still haunted by this formulation
allergyphd.bsky.social
”Drawing on analyses of failure (Halberstam 2011) and willfulness (Ahmed 2014), I suggest a re-evaluation of “success” and “failure” in doing “real” science.
Reposted by Danya Glabau
jordantyranny.bsky.social
"That's all anybody can do right now. Live. Hold out. Survive. I don't know whether good times are coming back again. But I know that won't matter if we don't survive these times."

Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower (Earthseed, #1)
That's all anybody can do right now. Live. Hold out. Survive. I don't know whether good times are coming back again. But I know that won't matter if we don't survive these times.

Octavia E. Butler, Parable of the Sower (Earthseed, #1)
Reposted by Danya Glabau
brooklyninstitute.bsky.social
Tragedy and Decolonization: From Pessimism to Emancipation | Fall Courses | BISR Online | buff.ly/uUlUR2K
allergyphd.bsky.social
The number of times I've heard that what education is has to change because AI! When people say this to me now, I just say, "no." Usually they stop talking for ten seconds because no one is ever telling them no, and that's the whole problem
tedmccormick.bsky.social
The basic structure of so much commentary, some in the guise of academic study, reduces to:

(1) generative AI products are detrimental to the goals of education

(2) therefore, the goals of education must change.

Without the tacit axiom that AI has authority behind it, that just doesn’t follow.
allergyphd.bsky.social
This is exactly what my talk on LLMs in the classroom next week is about.

In fact, the last line of my slides is, in bold: "At the end of the day, FACULTY control the curriculum."
tedmccormick.bsky.social
It is hard not to connect these observable features of “academic” work on AI to the collapse of faculty governance in universities. Even academics in the midst of *doing* academic work *about* their academic work write as if they have no real choices about the material context in which it occurs.
allergyphd.bsky.social
Teaching a PhD seminar to 1/3 social scientists and 2/3 computer/data scientists has really clarified for me what social theory is and what a social explanation does, how it makes an argument
allergyphd.bsky.social
Yes for sure, these studies triggered the concern. And a lot of folks have been pointing them out. But in terms of, why is it a political issue now, that's a different question that I (maybe unfairly?) read into your and other comments, and that's more what I was thinking about in my posts
allergyphd.bsky.social
I actually don't think there is a top-down conspiracy here, and nor do you need one when your entire medical system is based on refusing patients access to basic care and then treating them like garbage three months later when they finally book time with a provider
allergyphd.bsky.social
So people have a hunch they need to be careful about their health as soon as they conceive, they go online, and they find the Tylenol causes autism content, and then they SIT WITH THAT INFO FOR TWO MORE MONTHS

Why are we surprised that people believe all of these lies
allergyphd.bsky.social
In my professional opinion as a medical anthropologist, I think this is almost entirely the fault of how pregnancy care is managed in the US.

I was not ALLOWED to see an OB until I was 10 weeks pregnant. Do you know how many ways you can unknowingly harm an embryo by that stage of pregnancy?!
allergyphd.bsky.social
I see people asking this a lot. It's online pregnancy and parenting forums. That's where this is coming from. It was just getting going in 2020/2021 when I was pregnant, but it's ubiquitous now
mmitchell.bsky.social
Aside: Did the CEO of Tylenol anger the administration? It's odd they're focusing on a specific brand, no? Not the active ingredient, acetaminophen (also called paracetamol)? Is buying Generic Acetaminophen fine, but not Tylenol? This seems to me like there's something else behind the scenes. /end
Reposted by Danya Glabau
sivav.bsky.social
Ah yes. The core principle of science that says one should start with the conclusion and then construct the evidence to support it.
atrupar.com
RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: "It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof."
allergyphd.bsky.social
Dystopian is the nicest word I can think of for that
Reposted by Danya Glabau
timnitgebru.bsky.social
👇👇👇
emilymbender.bsky.social
If your invited keynote speaker works for a company started because OpenAI wasn't basing its work enough on science fiction and said speaker uncritically cites TESCREAList, fictional work masquerading as science, you might not have organized a serious academic gathering.
allergyphd.bsky.social
Another request! Several people sent awesome art, which reminds me: What are some tech-critical t-shirts I should be wearing to let everyone know to not talk to me about AI in public?
allergyphd.bsky.social
Ok friends, it's your time to shine: What visual metaphors are out there for LLM/AI resistance and refusal? Making slides for a thing!
allergyphd.bsky.social
Ugh I did hear an interview with the CEO on NPR today, though. He's retconning the whole thing to say he intended for these to get defaced and that's his brilliant marketing strategy. Which just underscores to me that there is a strategy of just fully ignoring these folks that would work.
allergyphd.bsky.social
Wow yeah that answers the brief though I think it goes a little *too* hard for this project