Jayne Fracture
@jaynefracture.bsky.social
socialist & anti-fascist to the core
hater of what hates us, lover of what's left
she/her 🏳️⚧️ ⚢ 🇵🇸 ✊
hater of what hates us, lover of what's left
she/her 🏳️⚧️ ⚢ 🇵🇸 ✊
Reposted by Jayne Fracture
Definitely just did the thing
It might also be worth remembering that transmisogyny is an amplifying factor, just like other forms of intersectionality
It might also be worth remembering that transmisogyny is an amplifying factor, just like other forms of intersectionality
January 7, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Definitely just did the thing
It might also be worth remembering that transmisogyny is an amplifying factor, just like other forms of intersectionality
It might also be worth remembering that transmisogyny is an amplifying factor, just like other forms of intersectionality
Reposted by Jayne Fracture
The difference is pretty subtle, and it's in the dropping of the veil of liberal foreign policy, the "international order" bullshit
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
January 6, 2026 at 7:38 PM
The difference is pretty subtle, and it's in the dropping of the veil of liberal foreign policy, the "international order" bullshit
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
The difference is pretty subtle, and it's in the dropping of the veil of liberal foreign policy, the "international order" bullshit
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
January 6, 2026 at 7:38 PM
The difference is pretty subtle, and it's in the dropping of the veil of liberal foreign policy, the "international order" bullshit
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
It's true that America never had an issue sidestepping that veil when needed, but dropping it completely now allows them to be more reactive, which isn't a good thing
politics always has been life and death for many
who lives, who dies, who works, who prospers, have always been the questions that politics exists to answer
who lives, who dies, who works, who prospers, have always been the questions that politics exists to answer
January 1, 2026 at 8:30 PM
politics always has been life and death for many
who lives, who dies, who works, who prospers, have always been the questions that politics exists to answer
who lives, who dies, who works, who prospers, have always been the questions that politics exists to answer
graphing calculators are everyone's friend
they're the Mr. Rogers of math class 💜
they're the Mr. Rogers of math class 💜
November 28, 2025 at 10:23 PM
graphing calculators are everyone's friend
they're the Mr. Rogers of math class 💜
they're the Mr. Rogers of math class 💜
He was still a liberal, still in the pockets of Bay Street, still playing the game, but obviously not deep enough in those pockets for many people's taste
His relative lack of austerity & privatisation compared to Martin or Chrétien speaks for itself. Bay St didn't turn its back on him for nothing
His relative lack of austerity & privatisation compared to Martin or Chrétien speaks for itself. Bay St didn't turn its back on him for nothing
November 28, 2025 at 4:28 AM
He was still a liberal, still in the pockets of Bay Street, still playing the game, but obviously not deep enough in those pockets for many people's taste
His relative lack of austerity & privatisation compared to Martin or Chrétien speaks for itself. Bay St didn't turn its back on him for nothing
His relative lack of austerity & privatisation compared to Martin or Chrétien speaks for itself. Bay St didn't turn its back on him for nothing
Being the son of a Prime Minister is what allowed him an inside seat despite his politics not lining up with most of the party's power players. His name was the only reason he pushed his way into leadership.
He saw himself as more of a post-war-style liberal like his dad, and less of a neoliberal.
He saw himself as more of a post-war-style liberal like his dad, and less of a neoliberal.
November 28, 2025 at 4:23 AM
Being the son of a Prime Minister is what allowed him an inside seat despite his politics not lining up with most of the party's power players. His name was the only reason he pushed his way into leadership.
He saw himself as more of a post-war-style liberal like his dad, and less of a neoliberal.
He saw himself as more of a post-war-style liberal like his dad, and less of a neoliberal.