Jb🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
LightNews LightNews
banner
jbt72.bsky.social
Jb🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
@jbt72.bsky.social
91 followers 120 following 43 posts
Kilmarnock, Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Dissolve the Union
LGBTQ+ 🌈
Posts Replies Media Videos
jbt72.bsky.social
Nope. Not gonna work. Why do you keep with this nonsense.
SNP 1 GREEN 2
February 5, 2026 at 6:52 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
Alba 😂😂😂. Aye right. They are the definition of a wasted vote. Good riddance once and for all after this election.
February 5, 2026 at 6:40 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
Haha. You have no idea all the way from London.
January 28, 2026 at 12:45 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
a man talking to a woman who says you have failed me keir starmer thank you
ALT: a man talking to a woman who says you have failed me keir starmer thank you
media.tenor.com
January 25, 2026 at 4:58 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
Yes and still down.
January 23, 2026 at 6:05 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
,😂😂😂
January 20, 2026 at 6:27 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
Bring it on. Absolute idiot.
January 17, 2026 at 4:46 PM
jbt72.bsky.social
The answer to all that is independence.
January 6, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Reposted by Jb🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
goodlawproject.org
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal.

This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners have chosen.
631. The third aspect was her evidence given when recalled in relation to a message she had passed on to her group of friends which related to floods in Pakistan in the most highly offensive terms. She initially described the messages as “dark humour”. Her evidence later was that the message had been sent to provoke a reaction, in broad summary. We did not consider that latter evidence to be credible given the content of the message sent and her initial evidence about it. In our view it was an untruthful attempt to downplay what she had done, which she recognised as having included very offensive material. We consider that it was clear beyond serious argument that the author or authors of the original message considered the remarks humorous, and that the claimant had also considered them humorous which was why she had passed them on. That was supported in our view by her reference to dark humour
December 8, 2025 at 2:34 PM