JdS
@jds67.bsky.social
Reposted by JdS
When America Has Your Back
.
Cartoon by Kevin KAL Kallaugher
.
Cartoon by Kevin KAL Kallaugher
November 27, 2025 at 9:19 AM
When America Has Your Back
.
Cartoon by Kevin KAL Kallaugher
.
Cartoon by Kevin KAL Kallaugher
Reposted by JdS
Dr. Jane Goodall filmed an interview with Netflix in March 2025 that she understood would only be released after her death.
October 5, 2025 at 9:08 AM
Dr. Jane Goodall filmed an interview with Netflix in March 2025 that she understood would only be released after her death.
Wordle 1,565 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,566 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
How about that!
🟨⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,566 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
How about that!
October 2, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Wordle 1,565 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,566 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
How about that!
🟨⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Wordle 1,566 2/6*
🟨⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
How about that!
Reposted by JdS
Young’s opinion, which rules that the Trump admin illegally targeted pro-Palestinian students for deportation, is absolutely scathing.
“In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police…ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it.”
“In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police…ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it.”
![And there's the issue of masks. This Court has listened
carefully to the reasons given by Öztürk's captors for masking-
up and has heard the same reasons advanced by the defendant Todd
Lyons, Acting Director of ICE. It rejects this testimony as
disingenuous, squalid and dishonorable. ICE goes masked for a
single reason -- to terrorize Americans into quiescence. Small
wonder ICE often seems to need our respected military to guard
them
as they go about implementing our immigration laws. It
should be noted that our troops do not ordinarily wear masks.
Can you imagine a masked marine? It is a matter of honor -- and
honor still matters.
To us, masks are associated with cowardly
desperados and the despised Ku Klux Klan. In all our history we
have never tolerated an armed masked secret police.
Carrying on
in this fashion, ICE brings indelible obloquy to this
administration and everyone who works in it
"We can not escape
history," Lincoln righty said. "[It] will light us down in
honor or dishonor, to the latest generation." Abraham Lincoln,
Second Annual Message to Congress (Dec. 1, 1862) .
Perhaps we're now afraid to stick our necks out. If the
distinguished Homeland Security intelligence agency can be
weaponized to squelch the free speech rights of a small, hapless
group of non-citizens in our midst, so too can the Federal Home
Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the audit divisions of the I.R.s.
and the Social Security Administration be unconstitutionally
[98]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:t4x2ruk2qmob2b2cx55h4v7r/bafkreihgsrhgkiqcd2n5xd4gz5m6rmgwiejrqz72jjf4rvjtzrexujm3ya@jpeg)
September 30, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Young’s opinion, which rules that the Trump admin illegally targeted pro-Palestinian students for deportation, is absolutely scathing.
“In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police…ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it.”
“In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police…ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it.”
Watched “The Long Walk” today. I read the book in the late 80’s and it and “The Running Man” always stuck in my mind. As far as I could recall, the director was true to the book right until the end, which I immediately realized was changed. It’s not bad, just different, but when I looked up….
September 21, 2025 at 2:45 AM
Watched “The Long Walk” today. I read the book in the late 80’s and it and “The Running Man” always stuck in my mind. As far as I could recall, the director was true to the book right until the end, which I immediately realized was changed. It’s not bad, just different, but when I looked up….
Reposted by JdS
this court says that allowing EPA to regulate carbon emissions is a "major question" that demands congressional debate. but allowing the president to, with a flick of the wrist, end a straightforward constitutional right is something that must be allowed to stand?
June 27, 2025 at 2:42 PM
this court says that allowing EPA to regulate carbon emissions is a "major question" that demands congressional debate. but allowing the president to, with a flick of the wrist, end a straightforward constitutional right is something that must be allowed to stand?
Reposted by JdS
