🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
banner
jeeshadow1.bsky.social
🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
@jeeshadow1.bsky.social
29-Politics and Star Shows. Team Queen Rhaenyra and Rhaenicent because I love pain. Rommunist. Literally a cat. Fuck Canon. City planner. He/they #BLM
@Jeeshadow1 on the other place
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Police are using their status as "crime victims" to hide videos that would reveal police misconduct.
December 7, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Very few provisions on the Constitution have a meaning as readily and definitively discernible from text and history as the Citizenship Clause. All credible evidence leads to the same place. If self-proclaimed originalists can’t get this one right, they discredit the entire project of originalism.
December 7, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
If you want to tell me the plain language of the Constitution means something entirely different, you ought to have a heavy burden. But because we've allowed the public practices of folk constitutionalism to atrophy into lawyerly monopoly (see below), there's a brute appeal to authority available.
I gave the article a nice long 18th century-style title:

Folk Constitutionalism, or Why It Matters How Ordinary People Think about the Constitution

Here's the abstract, and a link to an ungated preprint: kevinjelliott.net/wp-content/u...
December 7, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
again, it is just arrogance. “there is one true meaning of the constitution and it can only be derived by a special caste of lawyers with a special interpretative lens and once discovered it is binding.”
December 7, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
so much of the conservative legal revolution seems to outright reject the idea that democratic publics legitimately constituted can fix the meaning of the constitution without formal amendment.
December 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
the president is not an elected sovereign. he does not speak for the people or embody their will, he merely represents them. if he wants to change the constitution, let him make his case.
December 7, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
the idea that a handful of conservative legal scholars have an understanding that should supersede a settlement affirmed my generations of american is astoundingly arrogant, and the idea that trump — or any president — can unilaterally overturn that settlement is just despotism
December 7, 2025 at 7:18 PM