Jeff from End of a Species
banner
jeff.endofaspecies.com
Jeff from End of a Species
@jeff.endofaspecies.com
Co-founder and host of the End of a Species podcast.
https://links.endofaspecies.com
Expressed out of their filthy wannabe bourgeois Temu soon-to-face-the-wall mouth hole.
December 10, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Exactly. Great analogy btw. It’s not enough to just see a person buying the hat to draw a strong inference. But there is room to gather additional data that motivates the conclusion. e.g. the person could hate baseball but love Jay-Z
December 9, 2025 at 4:23 PM
I just don't have to accept an irrational position, which makes it my responsibility to point it out for others to see that they don't have to accept it either.
December 9, 2025 at 4:17 PM
I agree with you on the assessment of apologetics simpliciter btw. I'm just addressing the rhetorical goals of the dialectic, and each interlocutor's actual burden or responsibility. Case in point, there is nothing that says a person can't just decide to be irrational.
December 9, 2025 at 4:16 PM
I think where a lot of people fall flat is that they expect the apologist to stop. If their position is irrational, they have committed to irrationality, and that is actually fine. Our task is to prevent them from sneaking that irrationality into a rational conversation through the dialectic.
December 9, 2025 at 4:15 PM
In the case of conversations about race/racism, most racists will attack the identity or motives of the interlocutor (“victim mentality” or “you just hate WP”) instead of addressing the argument/empirics.
December 9, 2025 at 2:40 PM
I’m certain someone said that to him, and it would be Bulverism to say it, because there are probably other ways to negate his proposition without accusing him of motivated reasoning.
December 9, 2025 at 2:38 PM
100% questionable source, but he would also be a good example, and I’ll illustrate why on my next reply.
December 9, 2025 at 2:36 PM
No pause.
December 8, 2025 at 8:51 PM
I’m just waiting for a rebuttal to my argument or a source. The meta is irrelevant to me. Every part of this is just cope at this point.
December 8, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Here’s the steelman: Fairskinned black people do not have white privilege but can perform colorism. You are positing that on a social level, white Jews are in the same or a similar boat. Either that, or you brought up colorism for no reason. Attacking literacy is just another page out of the book.
December 8, 2025 at 4:38 AM
So white Jews = fair skinned black now? Smh this is embarrassing.
December 8, 2025 at 4:26 AM