Shoulda woulda coulda.

Fetterman, certainly.

Here's a direct quote from her followup video:

"I'm not prepared to say we've got to throw (Shumer) out or replace him".

And I still agree with her.

What if it’s not just face-saving spin, but actually true?

I’m a progressive. I think Shumer should step down because of his age. But not over this.

www.youtube.com/live/NM8mtDm...

Can we please stop knee-jerk eating our own? Watch this.

www.youtube.com/live/NM8mtDm...

“Caving”.

www.youtube.com/live/NM8mtDm...

“Her cone rejects the pleasures of the senso-ring!”

Fuck AI.

Now we ask the ‘right to life’ crowd whether we all need to stop washing, lest any of the potential lives in our skin cells be ‘murdered’.

Right. “Traditional” only identifies the way things have been done. It doesn’t invite a conversation about *why* things were done a certain way, or what people liked about the way things were done, or how what they liked might be done even better. #ttrpg #ttisg

Nope! There are no 'dibs', no dividing the man up into different bits for players to squabble over. Everyone plays a 100% complete Malkovich.

And the GM (Grand Malkovich) is also Malkovich, watching everyone else be Malkovich.

It might help if we talked about it some more:)

Any feedback or questions?

There certainly are systems which I'd agree have rules which aren't really necessary. The viewpoint I'm expounding addresses both them AND systems which (it could be argued) have too *few* rules.

There's nothing that every table agrees on. So that's not a useful standard. The standard must be a) is it going to come up often, and b) are there liable to be arguments if it's not handled objectively (by mechanics, rather than fiat). That's the most reliable way to serve the most gamers.

So sorry. When? There was another small update this morning, presumably bug fixes.