Jeroen Bosman
@jeroenbosman.bsky.social
1.3K followers 110 following 38 posts
scholarly communication specialist at Utrecht University library
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
For publication metadata nerds: viz of the generation of various metadata and their flow through the scholarly publishing system. The link goes to the online version that is fully animated, and has additional versions. Wonder if you think this is useful. docs.google.com/presentation...
(Animated) visualisation of generation and flows 9 types of (meta) data (full text, abstract, license,affiliations, funding, references, PR status, deposits, retractions) across 9 'actors' in the system (manuscript. publishers, crossref, search engine (e.g. crossref), search engine(e.g. openalex), ORCID, CRIS, repository, (search engine, e.g. openaire)
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Citing openness and validity issues, Sorbonne University in France decides to no longer supply data to the THE-ranking and thus get delisted. This is 4th major European university to take this step, after Utrecht, Zürich and Lorraine. #universityrankings www.sorbonne-universite.fr/en/news/sorb...
News | Sorbonne Université| Sorbonne université
www.sorbonne-universite.fr
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
@osfair.bsky.social anyone knows what is today's livestream link?
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Utrecht University Library will not renew their Web of Science license. Access to this database with closed, proprietary data ends in 2026. www.uu.nl/en/news/acce.... Step by step we foster a science system with open metadata. We committed to that by signing the @barcelonadori.bsky.social
Access to Web of Science will end on 1 January 2026

The University Library has decided not to renew its licence for access to the Web of Science citation database (including Journal Citation Reports). This means that, as of 1 January 2026, UU staff, UMC Utrecht staff and UU students will no longer have access to Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports.  

Why are we discontinuing Web of Science, including the Journal Citation Reports?
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
penders.bsky.social
We need to take care, collectively, not to allow a few dominant actors to impose social, political and economic conditions in which this process of meaning-making is captured for their benefit. 2/2
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
scurry.bsky.social
Thanks for the report on what was a troubling moment. For me the lesson was that the Metascience ‘discourse coalition’ absolutely has to question/critique the shifting power dynamics as more private organisations enter the open science space. And associated questions of trust. 1/2
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Yes, evaluators (and funders) deserve a place here. But real estate is scarce ;-)
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Was not there, but seems to be an important issue that will undoubtedly recur. I also cannot not mention that the moderator who silenced the discussion is from an institution that has frequently received students scholarships and collaborations on AI courses from Google Deepmind.
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
For publication metadata nerds: viz of the generation of various metadata and their flow through the scholarly publishing system. The link goes to the online version that is fully animated, and has additional versions. Wonder if you think this is useful. docs.google.com/presentation...
(Animated) visualisation of generation and flows 9 types of (meta) data (full text, abstract, license,affiliations, funding, references, PR status, deposits, retractions) across 9 'actors' in the system (manuscript. publishers, crossref, search engine (e.g. crossref), search engine(e.g. openalex), ORCID, CRIS, repository, (search engine, e.g. openaire)
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Science, researchers and research communities increasingly need to be resilient to threats and actual incursions relating to budget, academic freedom, safety in the public arena, science databases and infrastructures and more. We created this framework to inspire communities in their resilience.
A visualization of resilience strategies connecting prevention to potential threats, protection to actual threats, resistance to encounters/attacks, withstanding to incursions and repair to destruction. For the prevention strategy we suggest mutual interest and agreements/contracts. For protection we suggest (double) walls and sovereignty/control. For resistance we suggest action/fighting back and in/external solidarity. For withstanding we suggest elasticity and redundancy. For repair we suggest jugaad (=hindi for 'make do') and resources. The are generic strategies that need to be customised to specific contexts and threats.
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
Even aside from needing to reduce our environmental footprint by fewer, closer and more online conferences, the US has always been a very unwelcome destination for most people, currently allowing visa-free travel for only 46 countries' passport holders: www.passportindex.org/byWelcomingR...
Welcoming Countries Rank 2025 | Passport Index 2025
Discover which countries are the most and least welcoming. How many passports does your country accept visa-free? Is that considered very welcoming? Find out here!
www.passportindex.org
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
carlbergstrom.com
It pains me to say this, but if you are not a US citizen, you should not attend scientific conferences in the US, visit US institutions, or otherwise travel to our country.

Right now it's not worth the risk.

Hopefully that will change. If it doesn't, science in the US is sunk anyway.
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
carlbergstrom.com
1. It's Fustilarian Friday and today's drop is the "Restoring Gold Standard Science" executive order.

My read is that this is designed to (1) protect far-fringe figures such as the antvaxxers now heading our health agencies, and (2) kneecap efforts to use scientific evidence in regulatory policy.
Restoring Gold Standard Science
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United
www.whitehouse.gov
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
standupforscience.bsky.social
🚨Hiding under 6 sections of science sounding rhetoric is an edict to appoint officers at each agency that will be responsible for detecting research that isn't "Gold Standard Science" as defined by the White House🚨

Stay tuned for rapid response action!

www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Restoring Gold Standard Science
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United
www.whitehouse.gov
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
gretchentg.bsky.social
Here the Administration lays the groundwork for weaponization of scientific principles to justify rollback of science-based policy actions. This isn't just hypothetical, its what the first-term Trump Administration and members of Congress have done for years. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Congress's attacks on science-based rules
Proposed laws based on false premises could undermine science for the public interest
www.science.org
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
gretchentg.bsky.social
The Trump administration just dropped an executive order, "Restoring Gold Standard Science" and there's lots to unpack. This EO reveals more about how the Administration will approach scientific integrity and science in regulatory contexts. Some initial thoughts. 🧵
www.whitehouse.gov/presidential...
Restoring Gold Standard Science
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United
www.whitehouse.gov
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
journalcrr.bsky.social
Science doesn't disappear - but when misinformation spreads and evidence is buried, the risks only grow.

#JCRR is the first #DiamondOpenAccess journal dedicated to #CatastropheResearch. A platform for experts to share knowledge without political or corporate interference: https://journalofcrr.com/
Oliver Wing, Editor in Chief: "Climate denial. Data distortion. Politically motivated disinformation. In a world where bad actors manipulate facts for profit and power, controlling access to knowledge is a dangerous game. When research on disasters, climate risks, and resilience is locked behind paywalls, we don't just limit access - we enable falsehoods to flourish."  "Diamond open access, as championed by the Journal of Catastrophe Risk and Resilience, isn't just about free articles, it's about defending science. It ensures that peer-reviewed, evidence-based research remains in the hands of scientists, policymakers, and the public, not buried behind corporate interests or subscription fees."  "The fight against misinformation starts with radical transparency. If we want a world where decisions are based on facts - not agendas - we must break down the barriers to knowledge. The cost of inaction? A future dictated by those who shout the loudest, not those who know the most."
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
ejaxon.bsky.social
Last in a series on using ecological network analysis & resilience science to understand & build community well-being. Here I review the adaptive cycle model of community dynamics & what it tells us about where we are & how to navigate the challenges ahead.

deepweave.substack.com/p/adapt-resi...
Adapting Resilience Science to Community Well-Being, Part 3
Resilience as the ability to navigate the full community lifecycle
deepweave.substack.com
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
pcastromartin.bsky.social
"if you're a fan of #PIDs, or indeed of dinosaurs, you will be interested to know the #PIDfest2026 will be held by @SURF at the #Naturalis in Leiden in Oct 2026" - Eileen Wagemaekers at @euroCRIS #MM2025Leuven
www.pidfest.org
Home
PIDfest 2026 Save the date!
www.pidfest.org
Reposted by Jeroen Bosman
jeroenbosman.bsky.social
I provide (much) more context on Utrecht University leaving the THE university ranking in my longish thread here: bsky.app/profile/jero...