@jlineberry.bsky.social
Okay, Joe. That added nothing.
January 27, 2026 at 6:02 AM
Okay, Joe. That added nothing.
That's the pot calling the kettle black. I guess not being raised in the tradition, gives me a more objective point of view. Also, it's so obvious that some come close but won't be honest with themselves. Others just divert the topic when cornered.
January 27, 2026 at 6:01 AM
That's the pot calling the kettle black. I guess not being raised in the tradition, gives me a more objective point of view. Also, it's so obvious that some come close but won't be honest with themselves. Others just divert the topic when cornered.
It's disgusting. And you know it, as you pointed out other disgusting things about it. I don't know rabbitic talk, text, rules etc. It a *protected* religious history. Tell me, are you saying the term "law" is the lie. Pathetic.
January 27, 2026 at 5:53 AM
It's disgusting. And you know it, as you pointed out other disgusting things about it. I don't know rabbitic talk, text, rules etc. It a *protected* religious history. Tell me, are you saying the term "law" is the lie. Pathetic.
You pointed out other sexually perverted laws that were established. I can give you another, A rapist harms a girl <3, he has done nothing (to her value), but a boy who has sex with a woman is equivalent to her being penetrated by wood. What weird rule to establish in monetizing the worth of a women
January 27, 2026 at 5:34 AM
You pointed out other sexually perverted laws that were established. I can give you another, A rapist harms a girl <3, he has done nothing (to her value), but a boy who has sex with a woman is equivalent to her being penetrated by wood. What weird rule to establish in monetizing the worth of a women
Racism and misogyny are in the Talmud. To be either racist or misogynistic, you have to hate someone because they are a race or gender; or believe they are inferior. Period. Just calling someone something without proof is slander. Also, I never misrepresented your argument.
January 27, 2026 at 4:58 AM
Racism and misogyny are in the Talmud. To be either racist or misogynistic, you have to hate someone because they are a race or gender; or believe they are inferior. Period. Just calling someone something without proof is slander. Also, I never misrepresented your argument.
Thank you Joe, you proved my entire point. End of conversation. Indeed, why would they be written down these perverted fantasies or whatever they are, they are so... so... so disgusting. Hence the entire discussion. What a great point to end on.
January 27, 2026 at 4:48 AM
Thank you Joe, you proved my entire point. End of conversation. Indeed, why would they be written down these perverted fantasies or whatever they are, they are so... so... so disgusting. Hence the entire discussion. What a great point to end on.
Answer my question, why are you spread lies that I said something. I don't care about your text, other than you claim I am saying something that I didn't.
January 27, 2026 at 4:39 AM
Answer my question, why are you spread lies that I said something. I don't care about your text, other than you claim I am saying something that I didn't.
Are you the one who decides, what connections people have. You seemed entitled. You know nothing about me. Who are you?
January 27, 2026 at 4:38 AM
Are you the one who decides, what connections people have. You seemed entitled. You know nothing about me. Who are you?
Are you? I don't have a clue what you are suggesting, and lying about.
January 27, 2026 at 4:37 AM
Are you? I don't have a clue what you are suggesting, and lying about.
No, I'm talking about the misogynistic text regarding to girls and women, and people of different races, etc.
January 27, 2026 at 4:36 AM
No, I'm talking about the misogynistic text regarding to girls and women, and people of different races, etc.
Huh? That makes absolutely no sense to me. What do you mean? I never said that. Why are you double quoting something and suggesting I said it?
January 27, 2026 at 4:26 AM
Huh? That makes absolutely no sense to me. What do you mean? I never said that. Why are you double quoting something and suggesting I said it?
Apologize for lying about me if you have any integrity. You made up lies.
January 27, 2026 at 4:24 AM
Apologize for lying about me if you have any integrity. You made up lies.
You are a liar. Where was that said!
January 27, 2026 at 4:22 AM
You are a liar. Where was that said!
I don't know if those two guys are antisemitic. From that clip I can't say they are. Because people are calling others Antisemitic and Islamophobic that aren't, those accusations lost any value for me. For instance, saying Israel is committing a genocide is now Antisemitic. They are weak arguments.
January 27, 2026 at 4:21 AM
I don't know if those two guys are antisemitic. From that clip I can't say they are. Because people are calling others Antisemitic and Islamophobic that aren't, those accusations lost any value for me. For instance, saying Israel is committing a genocide is now Antisemitic. They are weak arguments.
No, it's actually diminishing the value of a raped toddler compared to a raped baby. The minimal age also for betrothal involves sex with a toddler. You've been arguing against me for seeing this as *&% wrong. Others in threads have justified this too. "Oh these are edge cases out of context"
January 27, 2026 at 4:06 AM
No, it's actually diminishing the value of a raped toddler compared to a raped baby. The minimal age also for betrothal involves sex with a toddler. You've been arguing against me for seeing this as *&% wrong. Others in threads have justified this too. "Oh these are edge cases out of context"
No, I'm American. Don't know anything about Jesuits other than they are a Catholic order.
January 27, 2026 at 3:53 AM
No, I'm American. Don't know anything about Jesuits other than they are a Catholic order.
I answered you directly. I never weakened your argument. I even agreed that I'm sure other parts have value. You've avoided answer me. I find some text problematic. And you should know that people will find certain passages, objectionable. You are dismissing that fact, and maybe minimizing the text
January 27, 2026 at 3:51 AM
I answered you directly. I never weakened your argument. I even agreed that I'm sure other parts have value. You've avoided answer me. I find some text problematic. And you should know that people will find certain passages, objectionable. You are dismissing that fact, and maybe minimizing the text
People in this discussion are saying it's antisemitic for non-Jews to question it. If it is only ancient laws, and discussions, and hypothetical scenarios then there wouldn't be such a defensive posture if it wasn't tied to a religion.
January 27, 2026 at 3:38 AM
People in this discussion are saying it's antisemitic for non-Jews to question it. If it is only ancient laws, and discussions, and hypothetical scenarios then there wouldn't be such a defensive posture if it wasn't tied to a religion.
Simply saying, "Yeah, those are ancient beliefs, we study them but do not practice them because we disagree with them, as they are disgusting relics of the past." You could then point-out the positive parts.
January 27, 2026 at 3:27 AM
Simply saying, "Yeah, those are ancient beliefs, we study them but do not practice them because we disagree with them, as they are disgusting relics of the past." You could then point-out the positive parts.
Those edge cases are a problem for me, and many others. Also I started researching with people defending the text, and quickly realized it was minimization to the extent of being disillusion. However, you are not as biased as others are. I disagree about the overall context.
January 27, 2026 at 3:16 AM
Those edge cases are a problem for me, and many others. Also I started researching with people defending the text, and quickly realized it was minimization to the extent of being disillusion. However, you are not as biased as others are. I disagree about the overall context.
Did I claim I'm Jewish? I do have some heritage connect to Jewish people, probably from South America. It's a small metric. Also, I'm not Christian. I don't really see the value in the "law" (meme) you posted.
January 27, 2026 at 2:46 AM
Did I claim I'm Jewish? I do have some heritage connect to Jewish people, probably from South America. It's a small metric. Also, I'm not Christian. I don't really see the value in the "law" (meme) you posted.
No, I don't. I pointed out that there are disgusting text in the Talmud, and that criticizing it is not antisemitic. You're the second to suggest that it's not perfect. I was referring to those who can't admit that certain passages (parts) are completely wrong such as the dowry values of raped girls
January 27, 2026 at 2:31 AM
No, I don't. I pointed out that there are disgusting text in the Talmud, and that criticizing it is not antisemitic. You're the second to suggest that it's not perfect. I was referring to those who can't admit that certain passages (parts) are completely wrong such as the dowry values of raped girls
I knew a guy in college who went out of the way to identified himself as a Jewish. He told me that he wasn't religious at all. Even though he went to Synagogue regularly. He was an atheist, and helped me workout my beliefs. So I was only referring to those in this discussion.
January 27, 2026 at 2:25 AM
I knew a guy in college who went out of the way to identified himself as a Jewish. He told me that he wasn't religious at all. Even though he went to Synagogue regularly. He was an atheist, and helped me workout my beliefs. So I was only referring to those in this discussion.