Johan Vos
banner
johanvos.bsky.social
Johan Vos
@johanvos.bsky.social
Java Champion, Gluon and LodgON.
co-lead OpenJFX, lead OpenJDK-Mobile . Java for science, Quantum Computing. PhD
I wonder what will happen to those analysts who currently promise heaven if you invest in this bubble. I don't understand why renowned banks put a completely ridiculous price target on e.g. Tesla, "because it's now an AI company". Will taxpayers have to fix their mess once again?
December 11, 2025 at 8:42 AM
Yep, we can agree on that :)
December 8, 2025 at 9:43 AM
What sometimes saddens me is how a thin layer of non-technical polish can determine whether software is considered valuable, while the underlying (code) work is taken for granted (and not paid for accordingly).
And often, that non-technical layer is less ethical than the software was meant to be.
December 8, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Well, that implies that you use the indirect revenue model, and have sales people promoting that, thereby making it hard for individual devs or non-profit orgs to contribute/improve. And that is what slows down innovation. Abandoning FX would be a big win for this money-focused approach.
December 8, 2025 at 9:13 AM
It is about identification indeed. All calculations are done based on indexes, so it's the mapping between index-Object that was missing. e.g. instead of

Program p = new Program(2);
new Cnot(0,1);

it now almost support
Qubit ctrl...
Program p = new Program(ctrl, target);
new Cnot(ctrl, target);
November 23, 2025 at 9:50 AM