John Wiggins
@john-wiggins.bsky.social
Thank you Like Skywalker. Taking down one authoritarian regime after another
November 21, 2025 at 7:52 PM
Thank you Like Skywalker. Taking down one authoritarian regime after another
2nd favorite. His favorite is himself
August 4, 2025 at 11:16 PM
2nd favorite. His favorite is himself
Nothing good nor bad will come of this. She can’t say anything that will change anyone’s mind, and if some accident befalls her, she was involved in trafficking children, so it’s not a huge problem
July 22, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Nothing good nor bad will come of this. She can’t say anything that will change anyone’s mind, and if some accident befalls her, she was involved in trafficking children, so it’s not a huge problem
Honestly, with the potato chip iq of the orange man, he might be stupid enough to do nothing with her
July 22, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Honestly, with the potato chip iq of the orange man, he might be stupid enough to do nothing with her
She knows nothing. She is the first person to be in prison for trafficking no one no where. Right?
July 22, 2025 at 1:12 PM
She knows nothing. She is the first person to be in prison for trafficking no one no where. Right?
On the one hand, I hate this bill because Trump likes it, on the other I like it because Elon hates it
June 3, 2025 at 7:26 PM
On the one hand, I hate this bill because Trump likes it, on the other I like it because Elon hates it
He is also a real idiot
June 2, 2025 at 6:09 PM
He is also a real idiot
Yeah, it’s proven that homosexuality is natural and not a social construct any more than being straight is.
June 2, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Yeah, it’s proven that homosexuality is natural and not a social construct any more than being straight is.
Ah, okay, I thought you meant that people were all straight and cisgender until the 80s, not that that’s when they started using that term. My bad, misunderstanding.
June 2, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Ah, okay, I thought you meant that people were all straight and cisgender until the 80s, not that that’s when they started using that term. My bad, misunderstanding.
“Widely Recognized”
June 2, 2025 at 5:19 PM
“Widely Recognized”
Please specify your argument. By you guys came along in the 1980s, do you mean LGBTQ+ started in the 80s? And Jewish people do not own the rainbow. Neither do queer people. Rainbow is used by religion, but also by LGBTQ+. It has predominant cultural relevance outside of religion.
June 2, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Please specify your argument. By you guys came along in the 1980s, do you mean LGBTQ+ started in the 80s? And Jewish people do not own the rainbow. Neither do queer people. Rainbow is used by religion, but also by LGBTQ+. It has predominant cultural relevance outside of religion.
Fair, however AI also agrees that it is predominantly a Christian and Jewish religious symbol. This is an argument about freedom of and from religion, and if the cross was sponsored by the government, it would effectively be a sponsorship of Christianity and Judaism, violating the first amendment.
June 2, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Fair, however AI also agrees that it is predominantly a Christian and Jewish religious symbol. This is an argument about freedom of and from religion, and if the cross was sponsored by the government, it would effectively be a sponsorship of Christianity and Judaism, violating the first amendment.
Inherent was the wrong word. How about exclusive? And also please don’t use personal belief as evidence, because then we will get into a “well I believe” argument.
June 2, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Inherent was the wrong word. How about exclusive? And also please don’t use personal belief as evidence, because then we will get into a “well I believe” argument.
That is correct. The rainbow, like the Ten Commandments is a symbol of those religions, however, unlike the Ten Commandments, it is not exclusive to those religions, or even religion in particular.
June 2, 2025 at 5:09 PM
That is correct. The rainbow, like the Ten Commandments is a symbol of those religions, however, unlike the Ten Commandments, it is not exclusive to those religions, or even religion in particular.
Yes, the rainbow is a religious symbol, but it is not inherent to a specific religion, and there is a significant amount of people who do not associate it with religion.
June 2, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Yes, the rainbow is a religious symbol, but it is not inherent to a specific religion, and there is a significant amount of people who do not associate it with religion.
No. Those are symbols of specific religions. The rainbow is not inherently religious/does not specify a specific religion.
June 2, 2025 at 5:03 PM
No. Those are symbols of specific religions. The rainbow is not inherently religious/does not specify a specific religion.
The rainbow may be used as a symbol in religion, but it does not signify a specific religion. The cross signifies Christianity, the Star of David signifies Judaism, but the rainbow isn’t a symbol of any one religion.
June 2, 2025 at 4:32 PM
The rainbow may be used as a symbol in religion, but it does not signify a specific religion. The cross signifies Christianity, the Star of David signifies Judaism, but the rainbow isn’t a symbol of any one religion.
I’ll amend my statement. No one uses the rainbow as the main symbol of a religion. It may have meaning in religion, but it does not signify religion. Unlike the cross.
June 2, 2025 at 4:31 PM
I’ll amend my statement. No one uses the rainbow as the main symbol of a religion. It may have meaning in religion, but it does not signify religion. Unlike the cross.
Not specifically, but even if you use it as only a symbol of your sexuality, it is a fact that the vast majority of people who use the cross as a symbol use it as a religious symbol. You couldn’t put it up without violating freedom of religion. No one uses a rainbow as a religious symbol.
June 2, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Not specifically, but even if you use it as only a symbol of your sexuality, it is a fact that the vast majority of people who use the cross as a symbol use it as a religious symbol. You couldn’t put it up without violating freedom of religion. No one uses a rainbow as a religious symbol.
If it is a religious symbol, which the cross is, no. That’s in the constitution. But there is nothing against the government standing up for the idea of people being who they want to be in the constitution.
June 2, 2025 at 3:28 PM
If it is a religious symbol, which the cross is, no. That’s in the constitution. But there is nothing against the government standing up for the idea of people being who they want to be in the constitution.
So you agree that if a symbol that only has significance in respect to you and you want to show your pride in it, you should be allowed to wear it?
June 2, 2025 at 3:25 PM
So you agree that if a symbol that only has significance in respect to you and you want to show your pride in it, you should be allowed to wear it?
I wouldn’t like it. That’s a violation of the first amendment, freedom of religion. It also is a government funded facility that would be making them prominent, not individual students. I have nothing against kids wearing crosses as long as they don’t use them to force their religion on others.
June 2, 2025 at 2:31 PM
I wouldn’t like it. That’s a violation of the first amendment, freedom of religion. It also is a government funded facility that would be making them prominent, not individual students. I have nothing against kids wearing crosses as long as they don’t use them to force their religion on others.