Don't dispute that but women were told of the change decades ago and they're still ending up in a favourable position cf men.

They're considering favouring (again) a favoured demographic

His speech incited the insurrection. The spliced speech makes it sound like he incited the insurrection.

Dancing on pin heads is not one of my hobbies.

It shouldn't happen ever but I think not materially changing the meaning (recent panorama) is of far less concern than when the meaning is changed/reversed (older BBC news).

It happening to Trump makes it no more or less concerning than if they did it to you or me.

I would understand if the programmes editors resigned over what happened.

I would just about understand this level of resignation if Panorama had deliberately changed the meaning of the speech to be significantly out of line with how it was received and acted upon by its intended audience.

Neutrality is so biased, didn't you know?!

The standards it has set for over a decade are usually seen in limbo dancing competitions.

It is under threat largely because of TD, RG. It's deliberately and openly slanted in favour of the NF party. That's the threat.

We've all seen the fawning output afforded to various incarnations of the NF party...