Johnny Pop
@johnnypop.bsky.social
Just trying to keep my friends and family from finding this..
Is there a link that I can use to validate this?
December 23, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Is there a link that I can use to validate this?
Looks like a little under 60-40 R there. Montgomery county is moving red as more come in. Nashville still has ~50% to report so we’ll see if the 80-20 D margin holds.. either way, it’s gonna be at worst R+7ish. Which is fantastic.
December 3, 2025 at 2:11 AM
Looks like a little under 60-40 R there. Montgomery county is moving red as more come in. Nashville still has ~50% to report so we’ll see if the 80-20 D margin holds.. either way, it’s gonna be at worst R+7ish. Which is fantastic.
No results from Williamson county yet. Went 2-1 Trump in ‘24 and has significant population. We won’t really know where we’re at until we get a dump from there.
December 3, 2025 at 1:47 AM
No results from Williamson county yet. Went 2-1 Trump in ‘24 and has significant population. We won’t really know where we’re at until we get a dump from there.
I’m hearing “billion” which is wild.
November 6, 2025 at 6:44 PM
I’m hearing “billion” which is wild.
He’s talking about his corrupt and, in any other timeline, illegal crypto ventures right?
October 29, 2025 at 4:53 AM
He’s talking about his corrupt and, in any other timeline, illegal crypto ventures right?
Yeeeah, but watching pitchers intentionally walk a batter while making it look like they’re not trying to intentionally walk a batter is a level of game theory too far for me.
October 28, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Yeeeah, but watching pitchers intentionally walk a batter while making it look like they’re not trying to intentionally walk a batter is a level of game theory too far for me.
I saw GWAR at a festival last summer and I’m pretty sure they did the exact same thing to a Biden character.
September 22, 2025 at 11:31 PM
I saw GWAR at a festival last summer and I’m pretty sure they did the exact same thing to a Biden character.
I didn’t read the article yet, but I assumed the take was “Charlie may have had horrible views and used hateful rhetoric, but he sought out the views and arguments from people who disagreed with him and gave them a platform to challenge him. He didn’t silo himself in an echo chamber. Etc.”
September 12, 2025 at 1:36 AM
I didn’t read the article yet, but I assumed the take was “Charlie may have had horrible views and used hateful rhetoric, but he sought out the views and arguments from people who disagreed with him and gave them a platform to challenge him. He didn’t silo himself in an echo chamber. Etc.”
@openargs.bsky.social IANAL but this is a bad lawyer thing right?
June 19, 2025 at 6:28 AM
@openargs.bsky.social IANAL but this is a bad lawyer thing right?
Any R would be getting every inch of spectacle out of this. The rhetoric would be out of this world and would shape a narrative that motivates voters. *shrugs “I was in a detention center for 3 1/2 hours” *raises eyebrows is such a fucking waste
Yeah, substance>style but fuck.. style still matters!
Yeah, substance>style but fuck.. style still matters!
June 18, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Any R would be getting every inch of spectacle out of this. The rhetoric would be out of this world and would shape a narrative that motivates voters. *shrugs “I was in a detention center for 3 1/2 hours” *raises eyebrows is such a fucking waste
Yeah, substance>style but fuck.. style still matters!
Yeah, substance>style but fuck.. style still matters!
There were thousands in Fargo ND…
June 16, 2025 at 1:03 AM
There were thousands in Fargo ND…
Or.. “holy smokes, look at all the election fraud the FBI is finding! Probably best to suspend the election until we can figure it all out”
April 20, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Or.. “holy smokes, look at all the election fraud the FBI is finding! Probably best to suspend the election until we can figure it all out”
Curious how this would change if it was percentage instead. Like, fuck that guy and fuck his policies, but percentage is really the only way to credibly/honestly analyze this.
April 4, 2025 at 6:54 AM
Curious how this would change if it was percentage instead. Like, fuck that guy and fuck his policies, but percentage is really the only way to credibly/honestly analyze this.
She made a big deal out of it in the 2020 primary then never explained if she changed her mind or why. For the average middle America voter she did the typical politician dodge that turns everyone off. She didn’t embrace it or deny it, so she pissed off everyone while coming off as inauthentic. $.02
March 14, 2025 at 8:05 AM
She made a big deal out of it in the 2020 primary then never explained if she changed her mind or why. For the average middle America voter she did the typical politician dodge that turns everyone off. She didn’t embrace it or deny it, so she pissed off everyone while coming off as inauthentic. $.02
Im a raging liberal in a red state surrounded by red states who used to reliably vote D. We’ve lost the working class. Talk to any farmer or tradesman, they’ll say Ds only care about gay trans kids and university professors and Rs are the only people speaking their language. We need to win them back
March 14, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Im a raging liberal in a red state surrounded by red states who used to reliably vote D. We’ve lost the working class. Talk to any farmer or tradesman, they’ll say Ds only care about gay trans kids and university professors and Rs are the only people speaking their language. We need to win them back
Fuck yes! The anti Trump/Musk sentiment is going to motivate D voters and keep R voters home. And the middle folks are going to swing left hard. It’s not unreasonable to expect a D to win a R+20 district. I mean fuck, spend a few tens of millions of dollars and at least find out.
March 14, 2025 at 7:21 AM
Fuck yes! The anti Trump/Musk sentiment is going to motivate D voters and keep R voters home. And the middle folks are going to swing left hard. It’s not unreasonable to expect a D to win a R+20 district. I mean fuck, spend a few tens of millions of dollars and at least find out.
In 1992 yeah, keep government open. There were enough honest participants back then to make an honest deal. But now? We’re worried they’ll use a shutdown as an excuse to fire too many gov’t workers after they fired too many gov’t workers during not a shutdown? Fuck that. Make them own this shit.
March 14, 2025 at 7:15 AM
In 1992 yeah, keep government open. There were enough honest participants back then to make an honest deal. But now? We’re worried they’ll use a shutdown as an excuse to fire too many gov’t workers after they fired too many gov’t workers during not a shutdown? Fuck that. Make them own this shit.
Why is nobody in leadership trying to win open congressional seats formerly held by Rs? Flood those districts with money. Turnout will be low, Ds and Is and moderate Rs can possibly flip them with a little effort. Then Dems control the house. Long shot, but worth it. Yet nothing from leadership.
March 14, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Why is nobody in leadership trying to win open congressional seats formerly held by Rs? Flood those districts with money. Turnout will be low, Ds and Is and moderate Rs can possibly flip them with a little effort. Then Dems control the house. Long shot, but worth it. Yet nothing from leadership.
He’s gambling that this is type of “talk to and be cordial with the other side” centrist pragmatic politician that most Americans who want unity/normalcy will vote for in 4 years. And he’s hoping enough lefties will see it as placating to the idiot masses in order to enact more liberal policies. 🤷♂️
March 14, 2025 at 5:57 AM
He’s gambling that this is type of “talk to and be cordial with the other side” centrist pragmatic politician that most Americans who want unity/normalcy will vote for in 4 years. And he’s hoping enough lefties will see it as placating to the idiot masses in order to enact more liberal policies. 🤷♂️