A lot of ACM papers are like this. But there are a lot of CS papers that are not peer reviewed. I cited one at some point, when to reread it, only to find it gone.

almost to a student, they reported regular use of AI systems—even the students most loudly and vocally "anti" AI had carved out exceptions—to paint with too broad a brush, students saw their own use of AI as considered, moderate, & defensible while other people’s was lazy, dangerous, condemnable+

I try to make sure they are real papers. A lot of stuff out there is fake (I’ve seen it taken down). But if it’s real, I am okay with it bc there are some papers that take years (econ). But if you aren’t comfortable, your discomfort is well taken.

Lololol that’s exactly what motivated that tweet

That’s kinda my thinking. Appreciate it.

Lolololololol. This made me truly smuckle. (Smile chuckle)

Oui oui!