johnwkrakauer
@johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
100 followers 9 following 6 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
First shot across the bow from ongoing project with Jake.
quiltydunn.bsky.social
New publication forthcoming in BBS, co-authored with John Krakauer: a commentary on @smfleming.bsky.social & @matthiasmichel.bsky.social's groundbreaking target article.

We critique widespread assumptions in cognitive neuroscience about the role of internal models in implicit cognition. (1/7)
johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
Of course. It’s extraordinarily that we even need to have this discussion - again - I despair.
Reposted by johnwkrakauer
‪@benhayden.bsky.social‬
@tyrellturing.bsky.social
@jmgrohneuro.bsky.social
@pessoabrain.bsky.social
I see a lot of talk on here about how we should avoid
"x does y" talk because the brain is "a dynamic, reverberant, reciprocally interconnected system".
But this does not follow.
A thread...
johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
Excited to share this new work
biorxivpreprint.bsky.social
A spinal origin for the obligate flexor synergy in the non-human primate: Implications for control of reaching https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.28.666086v1
johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
Agree, it is not a useful term at the level of neuroscience. It is an undeniable capacity at the psychological level. What the neuroscience of this capacity will look like is anyone’s guess.
Reposted by johnwkrakauer
nicolecrust.bsky.social
Terrific podcast relevant to our debates here about “What is an emotion?” But in the case of emotion, it’s turned up to 11 b/c (unlike “representation”), everyone alive has intuition and interest about the answers (including the public).

www.thetransmitter.org/brain-inspir...
What do neuroscientists mean by the term representation?
A group of neuroscientists and philosophers discuss the use and misuse of the term “representation” across the cognitive sciences.
www.thetransmitter.org
Reposted by johnwkrakauer
dlevenstein.bsky.social
Great interview with Hasok Chang on 'Epistemic Iteration':

The idea that we don't often start scientific inquiries from a solid foundation. We knowingly start from an imperfect position, and use the outcomes to refine and correct the original starting point.

open.spotify.com/episode/6tbT...
Audience Faves: Hasok Chang on 'Epistemic Iteration'
The HPS Podcast - Conversations from History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science · Episode
open.spotify.com
Reposted by johnwkrakauer
melaniemitchell.bsky.social
...it basically confirmed what is already well-established: LLMs (& LRMs & "LLM agents") have trouble w/ problems that require many steps of reasoning/planning.

See, e.g., lots of recent papers by Subbarao Kambhampati's group at ASU. (2/2)
johnwkrakauer.bsky.social
It was fun working on this with David and Melanie.
melaniemitchell.bsky.social
New paper: "Large Language Models and Emergence: A Complex Systems Perspective" (D. Krakauer, J. Krakauer, M. Mitchell).

We look at claims of "emergent capabilities" & "emergent intelligence" in LLMs from the perspective of what emergence means in complexity science.

arxiv.org/pdf/2506.11135
arxiv.org