<p><a href="https://privacy.thenexus.today/can-we-please-stop-arguing-about-whether-bluesky-is-decentralized/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://privacy.thenexus.today/can-we-please-stop-arguing-about-whether-bluesky-is-decentralized/</a></p> <blockquote> <p>"People who saw Bluesky as centralized nine months ago still see Bluesky as centralized. People who saw Bluesky as decentralized (or decentralizing) nine months ago still see Bluesky as decentralized (or decentralizing). Nobody's changing their minds in response to new information. It's basically the same discussions rehashed again and again.</p> <p>One thing that's been really striking to me in this latest iteration of this interminable discourse is that so many people in the Fediverse present the fact that 99.99% of Bluesky users are still using infrastructrure run by Bluesky PBC as if it's a gotcha that people advocating for Bluesky and the ATmosphere aren't aware of.</p> <p>No, actually, ATmosphere developers I talk to are very very aware of these limitations. They just prefer to invest their time and energy in working to improve the situation rather than arguing about the semantics of "decentralization."</p> <p>That sure seems like a good approach to me.</p> <p>So can we please stop arguing about this already?"</p> </blockquote>

<p>New on The Nexus of Privacy!</p> <p><a href="https://privacy.thenexus.today/mississippi-bluesky-blacksky-the-atmosphere-mastodon-and-the-fediverse/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://privacy.thenexus.today/mississippi-bluesky-blacksky-the-atmosphere-mastodon-and-the-fediverse/</a></p> <p>As well as a summary of the situation (both in the ATmosphere and the Fediverse) and links to a bunch of interesting discussions, there's also a discussion of just why age verification laws are so bad.</p>