You can also find a recording of the talk later on the same Youtube page.

This proposal to revoke the Endangerment Finding will prevent the government from regulating greenhouse gas emissions now and even in the future. There will be an opportunity to publicly comment on this proposal and remind the EPA that almost all climate scientists think this report is a joke.

I've given it a quick read and quickly realized that the sections concerning CO2 as plant food were full of confirmation bias and cherry picking. Further sections about climate change scenarios used strawman arguments. I fed the report into ChatGPT which agreed with my suspicions.

But much more research is needed before these experimental models can be operationalised for local climate services. Again I want to thank my co-authors for supporting this research.

So is there an added value for using these high resolution, yet limited run time models? It seems mostly a yes for extreme precipitation events, especially as the nextGEMS models compared well with a regional climate model. They can provide coverage to the globally underserved in climate prediction