WHAT

They must have some interests in common.

The weird thing about that whole sequence is them playing drums on the stormtroopers helmets, implying they ate them.

Doesn't anybody watch "Breaking Bad"?

Button lady

*are

But you said they voted against Trump. They could as easily have been voting against Harris, or voting for a third party candidate that they really believed in.

There was a law several years ago to modernize voting systems so I suspect most now use a combined electronic/paper process. Two independent records, plus monitoring by both parties, make it hard to impossible to cheat without getting caught.

Different places use different systems. In Pittsburgh, where I also worked the polls, the voter filled out the paper ballot by hand (filling in bubbles like SAT) and then fed the ballot into the machine. It showed what it read before casting. L the vote.

Here in Philly the paper ballots is shown to the voter for inspection before the vote is cast.

Hmm I think you're assuming the 3rd party voters, were they forced to choose, would have gone for Harris. But they could have gone for Trump, or stayed home.

Independent voters went for Trump. But in any case it's the voters who show up who matter.

Well, that's true if the Republican voters didn't also show up. But elections don't work that way. If you motivate one side to vote you inevitably motivate the other side too.

There are two independent records of the votes, and people from both parties monitoring the vote counting.

Did you read what I said about the paper ballots, and observers from both parties watching?

The last Democratic candidate who motivated low-propensity voters to vote was Obama. Trump, in fact, motivated a lot of low-propensity voters to vote for him. So if turnout had been higher he might have won by more.

I'm not saying they aren't depraved. I'm saying it's physically impossible to do what you are saying they did. And statistical anomalies don't disprove this.