Joseph Lemaitre
@josephlemaitre.bsky.social
570 followers 250 following 33 posts
👀 Developing novel infectious disease dynamics modeling approaches to inform public health policies 📍Assistant Professor at UNC-Chapel Hill (🇺🇸), PhD from EPFL (🇨🇭). 🌍 josephlemaitre.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
last time I tried it the system library autocomplete was super slow... not sure if I had a poor config, but I'd say half a second to get the proposal. I was really neat though
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
just learnt that vs code recently added native git blame decorations with setting:
"git.blame.editorDecoration.enabled": true
good bye complex extensions, goodbye gitlens 👋
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Great read.
If priced out of a bet, the best things is to sell the opportunity to bet to a higher bankroll party (if possible).
There are many cases in life where uncertainty can be traded at discount for certainty (insurance policy is a bet on a home getting flooded, bank loans, ...)
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
I don’t know R but these things are not plain text files?
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
I've been sneaking on that course (by Sam Abbott, Thomas Robacker, Nick Reich) for the past few days on github (did not see the deployed version) and it is really good learning material for learning epi forecasting: nfidd.github.io/sismid/
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Does Lucy get a nametag ?
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
James does really great science ! This is a great job
jameshay.bsky.social
We're hiring a modelling postdoc at PSI Oxford for two exciting projects: 1) modelling the early immune responses to Nipah vaccination, and 2) joining the PRESTO team working on immunobridging in vaccine evaluation studies.

tinyurl.com/5abbxrjh

Get in touch for more info! Deadline 4th August.
Job Details
tinyurl.com
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
This project is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation @snsf.ch, on a project grant specifically written for this reproducibility project! It’s a great win 🎉
Reposted by Joseph Lemaitre
deevybee.bsky.social
Wow. This is an amazing project with a huge amount of work behind it. Even if you aren't into drosophila, it's worth a look
hansonmark.bsky.social
The "reproducibility crisis" in science constantly makes headlines. Repro efforts are often limited. What if you could assess reproducibility of an entire field?

That's what @brunolemaitre.bsky.social et al. have done. Fly immunity is highly replicable & offers lessons for #metascience

A 🧵 1/n
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
.. but found Aider (usually Sonnet Architect + DeepSeek implementor) and Claude Code extremely productive.
Task is also important, it is incredible and safe for plotting and front-end... found it slows me down on many pure modeling task. All anecdotal obviously.
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
yes, very nice someone studied it so well. I am very curious on their hinted follow-up on agent. I always fount LLM clunky, and cursor frustrating (there is some kind of bad context compression or something) ...
Reposted by Joseph Lemaitre
hansonmark.bsky.social
But in fact, fly immunity is highly reproducible! 🎊

~80% of claims could be verified. Moreover, some challenged claims just reflect the field advancing its knowledge/tools.

The lesson: if the tools are good and the research largely exempt from direct translation pressures, science works.

3.5/n
A chart depicting the track of claims into verified, unchallenged, challenged, partially verified, or mixed.

Figure 1: Flow of the study.
Claims were first classified in five categories based on literature. 45 unchallenged claims were selected to be experimentally tested and
classified either as challenged or as verified. We further classify some unchallenged as consistent or inconsistent depending on their
consistency with current knowledge.
Reposted by Joseph Lemaitre
hansonmark.bsky.social
When everything is considered together (w/ caveats), the most prestigious institutes are the most likely to produce irreproducible work. Journal tier was a more minor effect, and in fact, "high-impact" but not "trophy" journals publish the most reproducible science.

But, many caveats (cont.)

4.3/n
A chart showing various factors and their odds ratios and relative contributions to irreproducibility in a multivariate mixed model.

Figure 10. Multivariable analysis of predictors of claim irreproducibility.
The forest plot reports the odds ratio and the 94% highest density interval of each covariate effect on
a claim becoming challenged.
Reposted by Joseph Lemaitre
richardsever.bsky.social
more than that but right order of magnitude. I always say $10^1 for preprint; $10^3 for journal article; $10^5 for research. most costs are staff not tech because of responsible screening, customer service, etc.
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Seems like it cannot do these little neat interactive javascript diagrams but claude has gotten better at ascii
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
I remember you talking about this :D This is great (I get a Error though, only when I am logged with Claude).
Hope you get back the you get a list of the questions
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
I'm not in epiengage but I'll try with something more unformed ! Squares with LLMs ability in green field projects vs already existing stuff.
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Oh no, I now have to test twice the hypothesis 😦
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
interesting, somehow never managed to use LLM for this, they always compromise my ideas/go too far.... I find them useful for nearly everything else (finding flaws in ideas, developing the concept).

Perhaps my notes are too scattered. Or my prompt is bad.
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
(Obvious disclaimer that LLM use comes with many shortcomings, and world model is something that is hard to define. Just hope for more nuance.)

arxiv.org/pdf/2403.154... is also a good read (yay for independent researchers).
arxiv.org
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Obviously, this last bit also highlights that the world-model is relatively brittle. But still, it exists.

That's for non-coders. For coders, there is a before and after using Claude Code. A lot of the academic literature on LLMs brushes over code (like the big PNAS piece recently forgot who).
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Chess is even my pet example to demonstrate how world-models are built by Transformers + Data.
The proportion of legal moves is very low, and a LLM always plays legal moves and quite good ones.

Gary's claim is caused by the chat environment that destroys the context windows for chess-playing.
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
This opinion (LLMs have no world model) is repeated at every AI track in IDD conferences, and while it's true for a narrow definition of world model, I am sure it does not square with audience experience.
Contrary to what Gary says, LLMs play good (1'800 ELO) chess: dynomight.net/more-chess/.
onisillos.bsky.social
"It is not just that LLM’s fail to induce proper world models of chess. It’s that they never induce proper worlds of anything. Everything that they do is through mimicry, rather than abstracted cognition across proper world models."

garymarcus.substack.com/p/generative...
Generative AI’s crippling and widespread failure to induce robust models of the world
LLM failures to reason, as documented in Apple’s Illusion of Thinking paper, are really only part of a much deeper problem
garymarcus.substack.com
josephlemaitre.bsky.social
Slightly related to what you describe at the IDD afternoon and your comment about complexity