Journal of Vascular Anomalies
banner
jovajournal.bsky.social
Journal of Vascular Anomalies
@jovajournal.bsky.social
​The Journal of Vascular Anomalies (JOVA) is the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA).
ICYMI:
Updated Classification of Vascular Anomalies: A living document from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies Classification Group
Introduction: The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies developed in 1996 a classification of vascular anomalies that became internationally accepted. The main feature was the division of vascular anomalies into 2 categories: vascular tumors and malformations. Major revisions occurred in 2014 and 2018, for updates and inclusion of newly described lesions. Major advances occurred in recent years, with improved understanding of genetic basis of vascular anomalies and its relevance in therapeutics. It created a demand for a new revision of the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification, and the process is presented in this study. Methods: A group was created in 2019, joining experts from different specialties and coordinated by the ISSVA Scientific Committee, to reevaluate the 2018 Classification on each subtype of vascular anomaly, considering the clinical presentation, histological subtypes, flow velocity, and genetic aspects. After several multidisciplinary online discussions and in-person meetings at ISSVA Congresses (2022, 2023, and 2024) the proposal for the new classification was presented for ISSVA members ratification, after an opening window for comments and suggestions. A new tool was created, named “Glossary of Vascular Anomalies,” along the contours of a medical dictionary. Results: A new layout of the classification was designed. The visualization begins with a general “Landing Page” where the basic division into vascular tumors and malformations is specified. For vascular tumors, the subdivision was kept between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors. For vascular malformations, the divisions were presented as fast-flow lesions, slow-flow lesions, and developmental anomalies of named vessels. A full classification table page with all updated modifications followed the landing page. All changes and new terms are described in detail and summarized in a table. The glossary lists and explains, in alphabetic order, all technical terms, abbreviations, acronyms, eponyms, genes, and syndromes related to vascular anomalies. Conclusions: The presented updated ISSVA classification of vascular anomalies reflects our evolving understanding of vascular anomalies, which will be continuously updated by a dedicated committee of ISSVA.
dlvr.it
June 25, 2025 at 8:25 AM
ICYMI:
Characteristics and Outcomes of Infantile Hemangioma With Non, Poor, and Partial Response to Standard-Dose Systemic Beta-Blocker Therapy
Objectives: Systemic beta-blockers are highly effective for the management of infantile hemangiomas (IH), but little is known about infants who do not adequately respond. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of suboptimal responders to standard-dose systemic beta-blockers in infants with IH. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate demographics, IH lesion characteristics, and treatment specifics of infants with IH with suboptimal response to baseline standard-dose propranolol treatment. Clinical response was used to assess the outcome after a therapeutic change. Results: Twenty-five infants were included in this study. Seven (28%) had segmental IH, 16 (64%) focal, and 2 (8%) indeterminate. The IHs were located on the head and neck in 21 (84%) infants, with 24 (96%) having a deep or combined component. Therapy changes after standard-dose propranolol treatment failure, most commonly by escalating propranolol dose to ≥2.5 mg/kg/d (59%) or surgical interventions (29%), were associated with good therapeutic effects. Conclusion: Among suboptimal responders to standard-dose systemic propranolol, IHs with a deep or combined component and located on the head and neck were the most common. This retrospective study was largely descriptive in nature with additional exploratory analyses. However, it is still encouraging that for patients with a suboptimal clinical response, higher propranolol doses of ≥2.5–3 mg/kg/d or second-line treatments with surgical interventions or systemic steroids can be considered as potentially safe and effective alternatives. Level of evidence: Level 4 (case series).
dlvr.it
June 25, 2025 at 8:23 AM
Updated Classification of Vascular Anomalies: A living document from the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies Classification Group
Introduction: The International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies developed in 1996 a classification of vascular anomalies that became internationally accepted. The main feature was the division of vascular anomalies into 2 categories: vascular tumors and malformations. Major revisions occurred in 2014 and 2018, for updates and inclusion of newly described lesions. Major advances occurred in recent years, with improved understanding of genetic basis of vascular anomalies and its relevance in therapeutics. It created a demand for a new revision of the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification, and the process is presented in this study. Methods: A group was created in 2019, joining experts from different specialties and coordinated by the ISSVA Scientific Committee, to reevaluate the 2018 Classification on each subtype of vascular anomaly, considering the clinical presentation, histological subtypes, flow velocity, and genetic aspects. After several multidisciplinary online discussions and in-person meetings at ISSVA Congresses (2022, 2023, and 2024) the proposal for the new classification was presented for ISSVA members ratification, after an opening window for comments and suggestions. A new tool was created, named “Glossary of Vascular Anomalies,” along the contours of a medical dictionary. Results: A new layout of the classification was designed. The visualization begins with a general “Landing Page” where the basic division into vascular tumors and malformations is specified. For vascular tumors, the subdivision was kept between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors. For vascular malformations, the divisions were presented as fast-flow lesions, slow-flow lesions, and developmental anomalies of named vessels. A full classification table page with all updated modifications followed the landing page. All changes and new terms are described in detail and summarized in a table. The glossary lists and explains, in alphabetic order, all technical terms, abbreviations, acronyms, eponyms, genes, and syndromes related to vascular anomalies. Conclusions: The presented updated ISSVA classification of vascular anomalies reflects our evolving understanding of vascular anomalies, which will be continuously updated by a dedicated committee of ISSVA.
dlvr.it
June 10, 2025 at 8:24 AM
Characteristics and Outcomes of Infantile Hemangioma With Non, Poor, and Partial Response to Standard-Dose Systemic Beta-Blocker Therapy
Objectives: Systemic beta-blockers are highly effective for the management of infantile hemangiomas (IH), but little is known about infants who do not adequately respond. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of suboptimal responders to standard-dose systemic beta-blockers in infants with IH. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study to evaluate demographics, IH lesion characteristics, and treatment specifics of infants with IH with suboptimal response to baseline standard-dose propranolol treatment. Clinical response was used to assess the outcome after a therapeutic change. Results: Twenty-five infants were included in this study. Seven (28%) had segmental IH, 16 (64%) focal, and 2 (8%) indeterminate. The IHs were located on the head and neck in 21 (84%) infants, with 24 (96%) having a deep or combined component. Therapy changes after standard-dose propranolol treatment failure, most commonly by escalating propranolol dose to ≥2.5 mg/kg/d (59%) or surgical interventions (29%), were associated with good therapeutic effects. Conclusion: Among suboptimal responders to standard-dose systemic propranolol, IHs with a deep or combined component and located on the head and neck were the most common. This retrospective study was largely descriptive in nature with additional exploratory analyses. However, it is still encouraging that for patients with a suboptimal clinical response, higher propranolol doses of ≥2.5–3 mg/kg/d or second-line treatments with surgical interventions or systemic steroids can be considered as potentially safe and effective alternatives. Level of evidence: Level 4 (case series).
dlvr.it
June 10, 2025 at 8:22 AM
ICYMI: Phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of QTORIN rapamycin in the treatment of microcystic lymphatic malformations http://dlvr.it/TJ46ty
February 19, 2025 at 3:31 PM