Abstract This paper offers an economic case for practical pacifism. Practical pacifism, in contrast to absolute pacifism, recognizes that, while it is possible that state-led war may be justified in some cases, it is extremely difficult to determine if any single instance of war is justified. This leads to a default position of pacifism. Using the tools of economics, we detail the main ways that political institutions are likely to fail and cause harm through warmaking-related activities. Our focus is on the epistemic constraints and incentives facing government actors, as well as the diverse costs and perverse consequences of warmaking. Taking these factors into account strengthens the case for practical pacifism. To date, economists have not engaged the literature on practical pacifism and scholars studying pacifism have not engaged the economic scholarship on political institutions and government failure. Our contribution is to connect the two.

By Dr Silviya Lechner Anglo-American University, Prague Hobbes’s state of nature, or what contemporary libertarian philosophers like Robert Nozick call ‘anarchy’ seems so worn out a concept as to d…

By Prof. Dr. Kerstin Wüstner The war as a crisis requiring management In times of crisis—such as economic downturns, the climate crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic, threats to democracy, and escalated c…

By Dr Jennifer Kling University of Colorado, Colorado Springs Uncivil obedience, also called malicious compliance, work-to-rule, or an Italian strike, has the potential to be a galvanizing force fo…