Yogi Fella
@jpeter1son.bsky.social
The funny thing about NAFO is that those of us who have truly found dog have gained something that words can't describe. If you are a fella, you know what I mean.
#NAFO
Слава Україні
No DMs
#NAFO
Слава Україні
No DMs
It's a display in a park a couple km south of the plant. Here is a geolocation of the pictured fighter jet.
Note: I found the recessed inground lighting to be a helpful clue.
Note: I found the recessed inground lighting to be a helpful clue.
December 4, 2025 at 3:09 AM
It's a display in a park a couple km south of the plant. Here is a geolocation of the pictured fighter jet.
Note: I found the recessed inground lighting to be a helpful clue.
Note: I found the recessed inground lighting to be a helpful clue.
Additional placements:
26253RMFS
Demand: 9 400.004
Placement: 2 340.000
Revenue: 2 192.980 mln
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
26251RMFS
Demand: 36 056.980 mln
Placement: 29 267.870 mln
Revenue: 25 219.685 mln
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
26253RMFS
Demand: 9 400.004
Placement: 2 340.000
Revenue: 2 192.980 mln
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
26251RMFS
Demand: 36 056.980 mln
Placement: 29 267.870 mln
Revenue: 25 219.685 mln
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
December 3, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Additional placements:
26253RMFS
Demand: 9 400.004
Placement: 2 340.000
Revenue: 2 192.980 mln
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
26251RMFS
Demand: 36 056.980 mln
Placement: 29 267.870 mln
Revenue: 25 219.685 mln
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
26253RMFS
Demand: 9 400.004
Placement: 2 340.000
Revenue: 2 192.980 mln
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
26251RMFS
Demand: 36 056.980 mln
Placement: 29 267.870 mln
Revenue: 25 219.685 mln
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
26251RMFS
Demand: 189.981 bn
Placed: 138.616
Revenue: 119.443 bn
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
Demand: 189.981 bn
Placed: 138.616
Revenue: 119.443 bn
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
December 3, 2025 at 6:45 PM
26251RMFS
Demand: 189.981 bn
Placed: 138.616
Revenue: 119.443 bn
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
Demand: 189.981 bn
Placed: 138.616
Revenue: 119.443 bn
Discount: 83.5915%
Yield: 14.90%
26253RMFS
Demand: 34.480 bn
Placed: 13.898 bn
Revenue: 13.025 bn
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
Demand: 34.480 bn
Placed: 13.898 bn
Revenue: 13.025 bn
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
December 3, 2025 at 6:45 PM
26253RMFS
Demand: 34.480 bn
Placed: 13.898 bn
Revenue: 13.025 bn
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
Demand: 34.480 bn
Placed: 13.898 bn
Revenue: 13.025 bn
Discount: 92.1861%
Yield: 14.86%
Here is my attempt to piece together some of the OFZ bond thread data. To start, here is Evgen Istrebin's post showing placements were 152 billion rubles.
Now to try to find the official chart.
Now to try to find the official chart.
December 3, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Here is my attempt to piece together some of the OFZ bond thread data. To start, here is Evgen Istrebin's post showing placements were 152 billion rubles.
Now to try to find the official chart.
Now to try to find the official chart.
Here is the liquidity chart for December 2, 2025.
www.cbr.ru/eng/hd_base/...
I don't have Prune-style analytical skills, but even I can tell this is a bad state after 3.27 trillion in liquidity was injected.
www.cbr.ru/eng/hd_base/...
I don't have Prune-style analytical skills, but even I can tell this is a bad state after 3.27 trillion in liquidity was injected.
December 3, 2025 at 5:52 PM
Here is the liquidity chart for December 2, 2025.
www.cbr.ru/eng/hd_base/...
I don't have Prune-style analytical skills, but even I can tell this is a bad state after 3.27 trillion in liquidity was injected.
www.cbr.ru/eng/hd_base/...
I don't have Prune-style analytical skills, but even I can tell this is a bad state after 3.27 trillion in liquidity was injected.
Update from the dark side:
We don't know the truth yet, but this is far more plausible than the initial Kremlin claims.
We don't know the truth yet, but this is far more plausible than the initial Kremlin claims.
December 2, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Update from the dark side:
We don't know the truth yet, but this is far more plausible than the initial Kremlin claims.
We don't know the truth yet, but this is far more plausible than the initial Kremlin claims.
When you get back you need to let us know if having the flu was better or worse than russian liquidity requiring a 3.27 trillion REPO auction.
December 2, 2025 at 2:42 PM
When you get back you need to let us know if having the flu was better or worse than russian liquidity requiring a 3.27 trillion REPO auction.
I'll check back later in hopes that this is a temporary glitch. I'm leaving this note just in case something needs fixed.
December 2, 2025 at 10:41 AM
I'll check back later in hopes that this is a temporary glitch. I'm leaving this note just in case something needs fixed.
The reason for this aside is to convey that even the best of us can miss the obvious. I'm sure I am missing somethings I don't understand yet.
As of now I am visualizing the raft of bubbles to appear similar to a Fresnel lens at the macro scale.
As of now I am visualizing the raft of bubbles to appear similar to a Fresnel lens at the macro scale.
December 2, 2025 at 1:08 AM
The reason for this aside is to convey that even the best of us can miss the obvious. I'm sure I am missing somethings I don't understand yet.
As of now I am visualizing the raft of bubbles to appear similar to a Fresnel lens at the macro scale.
As of now I am visualizing the raft of bubbles to appear similar to a Fresnel lens at the macro scale.
For some reason the most important criticism, the path the solar wind actually takes, was rarely mentioned.
www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/so....
It always struck me as odd that the shield not being in the right place was almost never discussed.
www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/so....
It always struck me as odd that the shield not being in the right place was almost never discussed.
December 2, 2025 at 1:08 AM
For some reason the most important criticism, the path the solar wind actually takes, was rarely mentioned.
www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/so....
It always struck me as odd that the shield not being in the right place was almost never discussed.
www.swpc.noaa.gov/phenomena/so....
It always struck me as odd that the shield not being in the right place was almost never discussed.
Searches for the keywords beam, lenses, and laser didn't lead me to anything useful. I only found a little speculation about a railgun in the discussion section.
In summation, while this paper raises interesting avenues, I do not see the information needed to visualize a propulsion system.
In summation, while this paper raises interesting avenues, I do not see the information needed to visualize a propulsion system.
December 1, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Searches for the keywords beam, lenses, and laser didn't lead me to anything useful. I only found a little speculation about a railgun in the discussion section.
In summation, while this paper raises interesting avenues, I do not see the information needed to visualize a propulsion system.
In summation, while this paper raises interesting avenues, I do not see the information needed to visualize a propulsion system.
The difference in cleanliness of the pot and kettle is extraordinary in this case.
December 1, 2025 at 12:43 AM
The difference in cleanliness of the pot and kettle is extraordinary in this case.
I'm not seeing a distinct second trail to confirm an interceptor. Perhaps we're just seeing an example of heralded russian craftsmanship.
November 30, 2025 at 10:48 PM
I'm not seeing a distinct second trail to confirm an interceptor. Perhaps we're just seeing an example of heralded russian craftsmanship.
I figured I should at least make a meme, what with how often we will see these corruption claims in the foreseeable future.
November 30, 2025 at 10:01 PM
I figured I should at least make a meme, what with how often we will see these corruption claims in the foreseeable future.
Please understand that I'm not questioning whether orbital data centers are possible. What I question is whether they are practical.
How do you propose to use Lunar dust to build 100+ low latency orbital data centers in 2026 at a cost that is competitive with terrestrial data centers?
How do you propose to use Lunar dust to build 100+ low latency orbital data centers in 2026 at a cost that is competitive with terrestrial data centers?
November 27, 2025 at 11:25 AM
Please understand that I'm not questioning whether orbital data centers are possible. What I question is whether they are practical.
How do you propose to use Lunar dust to build 100+ low latency orbital data centers in 2026 at a cost that is competitive with terrestrial data centers?
How do you propose to use Lunar dust to build 100+ low latency orbital data centers in 2026 at a cost that is competitive with terrestrial data centers?
Update:
Reports indicate that an A-50 was taken out.
Reports indicate that an A-50 was taken out.
November 25, 2025 at 4:59 AM
Update:
Reports indicate that an A-50 was taken out.
Reports indicate that an A-50 was taken out.
I swear there is a correlation here. I wish I had the time to sift through the data and match it with battlefield reports. I'm sure there is an interesting story to tell.
November 25, 2025 at 3:44 AM
I swear there is a correlation here. I wish I had the time to sift through the data and match it with battlefield reports. I'm sure there is an interesting story to tell.
Returning to the article we find that the turbine from Tatenergo won't be operational until 2028(compared to 2027 for TGK-2). I haven't found the reason for this yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if legalities aren't also involved.
November 25, 2025 at 3:23 AM
Returning to the article we find that the turbine from Tatenergo won't be operational until 2028(compared to 2027 for TGK-2). I haven't found the reason for this yet, but it wouldn't surprise me if legalities aren't also involved.
This is the smaller of two Taganrog airports. Both appear to focus on logistics, but there is more opportunity for damage at the larger.
I'm not sure what the target was. I will say I won't mind a chance to use our russian generals memes again.
I'm not sure what the target was. I will say I won't mind a chance to use our russian generals memes again.
November 24, 2025 at 10:59 PM
This is the smaller of two Taganrog airports. Both appear to focus on logistics, but there is more opportunity for damage at the larger.
I'm not sure what the target was. I will say I won't mind a chance to use our russian generals memes again.
I'm not sure what the target was. I will say I won't mind a chance to use our russian generals memes again.
The idea that Zelenskyy should go nuclear on US relations makes absolutely no sense to me.
November 24, 2025 at 12:30 AM
The idea that Zelenskyy should go nuclear on US relations makes absolutely no sense to me.
There is another interesting tidbit I came across on the evil place. MTLBs are much like M113s, armor built in such quantity it was hard to foresee reserves being depleted.
I have to wonder, if the russia is having problems paying meat, how can they afford replacement metal?
I have to wonder, if the russia is having problems paying meat, how can they afford replacement metal?
November 24, 2025 at 12:11 AM
There is another interesting tidbit I came across on the evil place. MTLBs are much like M113s, armor built in such quantity it was hard to foresee reserves being depleted.
I have to wonder, if the russia is having problems paying meat, how can they afford replacement metal?
I have to wonder, if the russia is having problems paying meat, how can they afford replacement metal?
It's not a piece of toast, but the omens have preceded current events.🤷♂️
November 23, 2025 at 3:01 PM
It's not a piece of toast, but the omens have preceded current events.🤷♂️
Well yes. According to russians something like 99.999% of drone damage is due to debris. This is also the reason that nobody ever asks the question, "What airdefense doing?" anymore.
November 17, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Well yes. According to russians something like 99.999% of drone damage is due to debris. This is also the reason that nobody ever asks the question, "What airdefense doing?" anymore.