Mike Jurney
banner
jurney.bsky.social
Mike Jurney
@jurney.bsky.social
New Mexican, New Yorker, Dad, SRE, Gardener.
Yeah, I'm doing fine but it's ominous in lots of ways
January 5, 2026 at 7:24 PM
They're not like interns or juniors at all, but in practice they sure are replacing them. I'm running a couple of projects now that previously would be me, another senior, a mid-senior and a junior or two between them and now it's just me and claude.
January 5, 2026 at 5:43 PM
Feels like a stretch goal, right?
January 4, 2026 at 4:09 AM
The best way I've heard this described is that the bottleneck used to be the production of working code, full stop. That bottleneck is gone now, so we're blocking on experience (knowing what things might work) and judgement (knowing if the design is sane/sustainable).
January 2, 2026 at 9:49 PM
Why do you have a "fuck rural America" tab of skeets? Genuinely curious here.
January 1, 2026 at 3:06 PM
Man that was an incredible bait and switch from trailer (Fast And Furious On The Mooooon) to movie (Daddy Issues In Spaaaaace). It was pretty, though.
January 1, 2026 at 1:57 PM
I just wish the little shits would treat it less like a consequence-free baccanal and drop less on the ground for the squirrels and the mice
December 30, 2025 at 5:14 AM
This is another one of those times where the reason and the rationale are conspicuously distinct.
December 28, 2025 at 3:41 AM
For years when we were all young in our careers we'd come in every work day in this gap and drink wine, play cards, and watch movies together. We called it The Interregnum, because anyone with any authority was dead to work for those days.
December 28, 2025 at 3:39 AM
No, they made one that wrapped it all up called Endgame. That was the end. It was a great run and a real triumph and something we can look back on fondly now that it's over.
December 24, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Oh wow, I've never heard that one. Neat!
December 21, 2025 at 3:17 PM
I'm going to agree with you very aggressively and point out that saying "not in our lifetimes" implies that it's possible in principle, which I don't think either of us believe to be true.
December 21, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Oh, interesting. I learned this as "fool's mate" and later as "blitzkrieg", with a few people having their own random names for it - "haymaker" and "hadouken", I think.
December 21, 2025 at 3:08 PM
You're arguing that there's no inherent quality to anything, only the fine details available for someone to perceive. I think it's extremely clear that perception is an experience adjacent to the reality of something, which exists uniquely in time and history.
December 21, 2025 at 3:05 PM