Jeff Yoshimi
@jyoshimi.bsky.social
300 followers 210 following 180 posts
Philosopher, phenomenologist, and cognitive scientist at UC Merced. Interested in neural networks and dynamical systems theory. Builder of simbrain.net and husserl.net. Website: https://jeffyoshimi.net/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jyoshimi.bsky.social
After 12 long years, my book “Gaming Cancer” was published today with @mitpress.bsky.social. Its basic premise is that by embedding scientific problems into the mechanics of games, we increase our chances of finding cures to diseases like cancer. #seriousgames #citizenscience.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
In the formula above I would have to learn to say “frak V”, “var-rho” and “var-phi” in my inner voice before I could work with it. If I can’t find a standard pronunciation, I will just invent something, like “the Prince symbol”. Is anyone else like this? Has anyone written about this?
jyoshimi.bsky.social
What do you do when you come across a symbol you can’t pronounce? Suppose it’s something you have to deal with and can’t just ignore. I find it remarkably unsettling.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I like the part about what you could learn from him you could better learn from me. Franz had some spicy in him!
jyoshimi.bsky.social
There are different ways to resolve the apparent tension. Maybe Brentano assigned the lecture on the paradoxes of the infinite and Husserl subsequently found Bolzano's other works (the Wissenschaftslehre?) in the bookstore. Anyway it's fun stuff. Also "Husserl Chronik" always makes me laugh...
jyoshimi.bsky.social
A much earlier entry in the Chronik, from the other bookend of Husserl's professional life (the student years, 1884/6), confirms Gregor's point about Brentano introducing Bolzano to Husserl. Interestingly, Osborn is again quoted, this time saying Brentano familiarized Husserl with Bolzano's work.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Here is the source of the story about Husserl discovering Bolzano in a second-hand bookstore. It's from late in Husserl's life, 1935. We have to rely on Spiegelberg recounting something Osborn said, so there are a few sources of potential error
jyoshimi.bsky.social
A little Sunday puzzler. In response to [email protected] post about about Bolzano I recalled Husserl discovering Bolzano in a bookstore. @gregorboes.bsky.social then noted that Brentano introduced Husserl to Bolazano's work, which also sounded right. So I went back to Husserl Chronik...
gregorboes.bsky.social
Bolzano was remembered as a mathematician, but forgotten as a philosopher. As far as I know, it was Brentano who introduced Bolzano's work as a negative example, with the unintended consequence that his students (Husserl, Twardowski, Meinong) got very excited and rediscovered Bolzano as a logician.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I went back to the sources. The full story is interesting, and raises a few historical questions. I'll lay it out in a separate post.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Also an important influence on Husserl. I recall a story about Husserl discovering Bolzano’s work just browsing a bookstore, but that could be wrong. It’s a vague memory.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I wonder if in the future people will place publications before 2022 in a special category called "Definitely didn’t use AI"
jyoshimi.bsky.social
She also discusses such notoriously obscure concepts as “chiasm” and “flesh” in a refreshingly clear way. Along the way we also discuss cognitive science, archaeology, Dreyfus, Hegel, Hans Jonas, romanticism, embodied cognition, different approaches to reading the texts, and much more.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
There's a ton of other cool threads. For example, Robin defends a continuity theory, denying that there are any deep rifts in Merleau-Ponty’s work. She argues that he pursues a singular philosophical project across his early, middle, and late works.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I described how I always struggled with Merleau-Ponty, finding it difficult to organize his rich imagistic prose into a systematic theory. But Robin's interpretation really unlocked the text for me, by embracing its ambiguous elements and its resistance to stabilization.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I already reposted twice about this yesterday, but allow me one more post, this time with my own reading notes!

So, last week I was on @trsam97.bsky.social 's podcast talking about Merleau-Ponty with @robinmuller.bsky.social ...

youtu.be/YPmuFqUwSLw
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Agree! But (as you suggest), it's kind of ironic that Fodor is the one saying this, given how anti-interdisciplinary he could be, especially about neuroscience. Just sayin...
Reposted by Jeff Yoshimi
trsam97.bsky.social
Robin Muller and Jeffrey Yoshimi discuss the phenomenologist Maurice Merleau-Ponty's views on the role of the philosopher in science. youtu.be/Pe9JxAammw8?...
Philosophers Should Not Arbitrate for Science (and Vice Versa)
YouTube video by Rahul Sam
youtu.be
Reposted by Jeff Yoshimi
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Yes the book is great. If ever there was a page turner in German philosophy this is it. The wizard thing fit his persona as the romantic counterpart to all the rationalist stuff. I think he called himself "magus". He had a mystical experience in his youth. So there is a bunch of backstory to this.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
In the end Kant ignored Hamann’s response, which insulted Hamann. A byproduct of the affair was that it introduced Kant to Rousseau.

#Philosophy #Kant #Education
jyoshimi.bsky.social
The longer discussion is fascinating, a capsule summary of the conflict between enlightenment and romanticism, between optimism and pessimism about reason. This whole section of Beiser’s book (“The Fate of Reason”) is a lively and fascinating read, filled with all kinds of juicy details.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Hamann described a plan that he knew Kant would reject, and warned against a wise teacher such as Kant corrupting the "majestic” innocence of children, saying “It is as easy for the learned to preach as it is for them to deceive”. Beiser called this the “Kinderphysic Fiasco.”
jyoshimi.bsky.social
In his 30s Kant had the idea of writing a physics book for children with the romantic philosopher Johann Hamann, also known as the “Wizard of North.” Hamann turned him down in a series of passive-aggressive “love letters”.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Yep I'd say that lol. There are reasonable arguments against this view; he's definitely doing something different from Husserl. But my old teacher Dreyfus presented him as a kind of anti-Husserl and I think that goes too far.

BTW I am just now reading reading Valis. 🦓!
jyoshimi.bsky.social
Yes! And he deserves praise for it IMO. Mach is so interesting. He's one of those folks in the "I wish I had a time insertion device so I could study them for a month" category.
jyoshimi.bsky.social
I stumbled on what I believe is an “Aizawa Attractor”, a chaotic attractor in which states travel from one side to another of an ellipsoid along spiral trajectories. It showcases the visualization capabilities of #Simbrain and also shows how discovery is facilitated by Simbrain. #dynamicalsystems