For the journal, we were able to build an algorithm to check DOIs and see if they return matching titles.

The ethical guidelines from COPE have flexibility on institutional reporting and we’re supposed to consider severity and intent. The case my journal had recently we decided against institutional reporting but I’m open to being convinced I was wrong.

That’s what I always understood. That you can’t take adverse action prior to a finding of wrongdoing. But I don’t know all of those procedures and hope to never have to learn them in depth.

An interesting question. In previous Title IX complaints I’ve known about, either from students or as someone interviewed as a witness, the instructor alleged to have committed misconduct was not suspended. Not at OU but two other institutions with some things in common.

Interesting - I'd seen RCM models as being not great for schools of education in general with some features that are maybe not great for collaboration, too. Curious about why other models are signs of budget problems (as a definite non-expert in higher ed finance)

I had to sign a loyalty oath at Oklahoma State many times (every time I was hired as a GA, adjunct, and postdoc)!

The thing giving my anxiety is I truly don’t know how our institution would handle it if asked. I think it’s probably a tough decision for any. But tough decision and enthusiastic excitement are different.

Generator for alternative image text seems good. I’d like to turn off the rest (because asking to burn it in the fires of hell seems like a reach at this point).

Three international students we admitted declined and two of them aren’t coming to any US institution. For context, that means we have zero new international students in my program.

Very. But I fear my budget will not meet the demands.

Super common conflation even in critical work!

Just a friendly note that male and female describe legal sex or sex assigned at birth and are not really genders.