Fascinating piece on usage of different AI assistants + a warning: ⚠️ "If you slip into just asking it to do [all your thinking] every time, it’s going to be very hard to get out of.” ⚠️ ig.ft.com/ai-personal-... @data.ft.com @financialtimes.com

🧠 New analysis of LinkedIn posts finds junior workers are feeling the brunt of generative AI's impact on the labour markets. Fascinating work by @bkleinteeselink.bsky.social

📄 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

🔬Radiology looks like THE job #AI should replace - involving image recognition, standardised tasks, & huge salaries ($520k avg).

But human radiologists are busier than ever due to messy training data, liability risk, and elastic demand.

Does the same apply to other occupations, and will it last?

Can only biological organisms ever be conscious?

Yes, argues @anilseth.bsky.social in a recent paper on biological naturalism.

I'm less convinced, and have written an in-depth response in a blog post here:

davidpreichert.substack.com/p/is-biology-necessary-for-consciousness

More than a hint of irony here? The FT pessimistic about the potential business benefits of AI, based on analysis by the FT... done using AI.

Seems hasty to write off AI due to little impact on the bottom line so far. Chat GPT was released less than 3 years ago. Change takes time on.ft.com/4ngEbKW

Zoom's CEOs predicts a 3-day work week is coming, thanks to AI.

I’d love to see it, but it’s hard to imagine such a dramatic shift.

Though the CEO of Zoom must know a thing or two about radical and unexpected changes in the way we work... 😜

fortune.com/2025/09/15/z...

💭When AI automates, firms may prefer to avoid hiring new entrants than to let existing staff go 🤔

My take on @erikbryn.bsky.social & @stanfordhai.bsky.social's finding that younger workers are hit hardest by AI

#AIandWork #FutureOfWork
🔗 bit.ly/4nl6G9W

🎓 Fully-funded master’s scholarships are still available for October 2025 start dates at top universities!

Check the full list of supported courses here: thedatalab.com/students/sch...

The ever candid, Geoff Hinton "...people are going to use AI to replace workers. It’s going to create massive unemployment and a huge rise in profits. It will make a few people much richer and most people poorer. That’s not AI’s fault, that is the capitalist system.” on.ft.com/4niqU4h

Agree - it's a fiendishly tough puzzle. Diff-in-diff on outcomes for workers more and less exposed to automation seems like a promising approach (assuming parallel trends hold) as per Humlum & Vestergaard www.nber.org/papers/w33777 Would love to hear any thoughts on this.

Early signs that AI is beginning to affect employment, with (unsurprisingly) new entrants being affected first. Important new research from @stanfordhai.bsky.social‬ digitaleconomy.stanford.edu/publications...

4-day week is often suggested as a response to AI-induced disruption. Great to get an indication of how it works in actuality.

"The experience of the Netherlands suggests that a 4-day week isn’t nirvana. But nor is it a fast-track ticket to economic ruin." on.ft.com/47fRruq @sarahoconnorft.ft.com

“Under an agreement between employers, unions and the government, workers can take time off from their jobs to train in something new, while being paid 80% of their salary…
The policy is in keeping with the Swedish approach to labour market disruption, which is to “protect people, not jobs”.

This is a crucial point that researchers must consider when using metrics that show 'how amenable a task is to AI' to estimate AI's economic implications.

Fascinating tales from the coalface about how AI is disrupting jobs in the tech sector. Looking forward to reading more from @bcmerchant.bsky.social on the impact in other sectors www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/how-ai-is-...

📣Job alert (no. 2)!

We are looking for a strategic, curious and well-connected Head of EU and Global AI Governance to lead our international policy work from our Brussels base.

Closing: 9:30am BST, Monday 8 September 2025.

www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/job/head-of-...

Just because a task *can* be performed by #AI, doesn't mean firms *will* use AI for that task (at least, not imminently). Many firms are struggling to integrate AI tools into workflows fortune.com/2025/08/18/m... @fortune.com @technologyreview.com

Key question from @laszlobock.bsky.social: "whether AI’s productivity benefits [will be] claimed by capital — feeding through to bigger profits or higher executive pay — or shared with labour, in the form, say, of shorter working hours or higher salaries" on.ft.com/41cuDrw @andrewtghill.ft.com

Governments need to wake up to the oncoming disruption that AI poses. We must be prepared with policies to stem a wave of inequality on.ft.com/4fjyngy @financialtimes.com @anjli.bsky.social

Sweden leading the charge with a well thought out policy response to labour market disruption from #AI 🇸🇪💪(of course!) on.ft.com/3GNKc1H @financialtimes.com @sarahoconnorft.ft.com #FutureOfWork