but I can do no "wrong" because I do not recognize the existence of any such thing. In this I am effectively a sacred Satanist. And deal in recursive inversion. Amoung more Pagan principles. /fin/

I will sacrifice your allegiance to the sacredly decentralized & destroy your marriage to an immortal ideology. I will reduce harm & strive for virtue, positive consequence & duty/.

B) Because they grew from the same intellectual tradition in which the social sciences were born, if we think of them as *frameworks* of course they can be synthesized. C) some of it can most of it can't.

(FYI this is a trick question. I am gonna leak that right off the top)

movements (e.g., Italian national syndicalism). While Proudhon critiqued Marx’s centralised state socialism, he nevertheless envisaged a synthesis of market exchange (workers’ associations, federated cooperatives) with communal or cooperative ownership of productive property. (Market communism)

In the anarchist tradition, mutualism and syndicalism are anti-capitalist, cooperative, and often communal modes of organising stripping them of their communal/cooperative content and redirecting them into authoritarian nationalist frameworks has in fact been a feature of fascist syndicalist/

Also listed as: 0195041518, & The Darkening Age by Catherine Nixey
Author: Catherine Nixey, ISBNs:
Hardcover (US edition): 978-0544800885
Paperback (US edition): 978-1328589286
Paperback (UK edition): 978-1509816071
Hardcover (UK edition): 978-1509812325

Also listed as: 0195041518, & The Darkening Age by Catherine Nixey
Author: Catherine Nixey, ISBNs:
Hardcover (US edition): 978-0544800885
Paperback (US edition): 978-1328589286
Paperback (UK edition): 978-1509816071
Hardcover (UK edition): 978-1509812325

And for anyone else in the community: if you get similar fake 'suspension' messages, don't click anything. Screenshot, report to actual Bluesky support, and post publicly. These tactics only work if we handle them alone and in secret. *Hall & Oats plays*

Which reminds me:

Lying, manipulating even when labeling it "cunning craft" and spirutalizing it to make you feel good about yourself, & DARVO like tactics completely undercut & invalidate anyone's claim to ethical harm analysis.

/fin

“There’s no ontological reality to crime” is:
✅ useful as critique of the state’s legalism
🚫 manipulative when used to erase real harm
You can reject the state’s definition of crime while affirming the reality of harm, accountability, and communal repair. Denial of that is crypto-fascist at best!

The feminist & anarchist position:
We reject state criminalization and uphold collective care.
We don’t need prisons to believe in consequences.
We don’t need cops to name harm.
We don’t need pseudo-intellectual excuses to dodge responsibility.

Both deny the material reality of suffering.

The point isn’t to abolish accountability; it’s to reclaim it from the state.