@kaybaxter.bsky.social
What makes a puberty incongruent with a gender identity?
Why does one's gender identity mean claiming to be the opposite sex, or no sex at all?
What's wrong with accepting one's physical sex as well as one's gender identity, since gender and sex are different things?
Why does one's gender identity mean claiming to be the opposite sex, or no sex at all?
What's wrong with accepting one's physical sex as well as one's gender identity, since gender and sex are different things?
December 22, 2025 at 8:27 PM
What makes a puberty incongruent with a gender identity?
Why does one's gender identity mean claiming to be the opposite sex, or no sex at all?
What's wrong with accepting one's physical sex as well as one's gender identity, since gender and sex are different things?
Why does one's gender identity mean claiming to be the opposite sex, or no sex at all?
What's wrong with accepting one's physical sex as well as one's gender identity, since gender and sex are different things?
What about men?
What is a Man?
Are men a gender identity or a sex class? Are men definable in their own right?
Serious questions - what exactly are Men?
What is a Man?
Are men a gender identity or a sex class? Are men definable in their own right?
Serious questions - what exactly are Men?
December 22, 2025 at 8:10 PM
What about men?
What is a Man?
Are men a gender identity or a sex class? Are men definable in their own right?
Serious questions - what exactly are Men?
What is a Man?
Are men a gender identity or a sex class? Are men definable in their own right?
Serious questions - what exactly are Men?
This piece from 2019 is relevant to British Quakers' interest in pronouns.
In my view, pronoun use has been made unnecessarily complicated and is similar to the use of titles and 'mannerly behaviour' which were strongly rejected by Quakers.
Use Plain Speech.
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
In my view, pronoun use has been made unnecessarily complicated and is similar to the use of titles and 'mannerly behaviour' which were strongly rejected by Quakers.
Use Plain Speech.
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
Pronouns are Rohypnol • Fair Play For Women
There’s a lot of chat around about pronouns right now. Specifically, ‘preferred’ pronouns. By which is usually meant, the pronouns a person would prefer.
fairplayforwomen.com
December 21, 2025 at 11:31 AM
This piece from 2019 is relevant to British Quakers' interest in pronouns.
In my view, pronoun use has been made unnecessarily complicated and is similar to the use of titles and 'mannerly behaviour' which were strongly rejected by Quakers.
Use Plain Speech.
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
In my view, pronoun use has been made unnecessarily complicated and is similar to the use of titles and 'mannerly behaviour' which were strongly rejected by Quakers.
Use Plain Speech.
fairplayforwomen.com/pronouns/
😄😃😁
Jenni, you are such a comedian!
Jenni, you are such a comedian!
November 10, 2025 at 5:42 PM
😄😃😁
Jenni, you are such a comedian!
Jenni, you are such a comedian!
How about if we have women-only places and gender neutral places?
Trans men and men will then be expected to be in the gender neutral places.
Trans men and men will then be expected to be in the gender neutral places.
October 23, 2025 at 10:44 PM
How about if we have women-only places and gender neutral places?
Trans men and men will then be expected to be in the gender neutral places.
Trans men and men will then be expected to be in the gender neutral places.
Reposted
Why has nobody from the post office been arrested for ruining lives whilst decent people are in prison just for protesting?.
July 8, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Why has nobody from the post office been arrested for ruining lives whilst decent people are in prison just for protesting?.
They not only allowed it; they actively conspired towards it.
All who did that should be jailed.
Why are they not already being prosecuted?
Do the innocent ones have to pursue them through the courts for that to happen?
All who did that should be jailed.
Why are they not already being prosecuted?
Do the innocent ones have to pursue them through the courts for that to happen?
July 9, 2025 at 9:10 AM
They not only allowed it; they actively conspired towards it.
All who did that should be jailed.
Why are they not already being prosecuted?
Do the innocent ones have to pursue them through the courts for that to happen?
All who did that should be jailed.
Why are they not already being prosecuted?
Do the innocent ones have to pursue them through the courts for that to happen?