keriothe
keriothe.bsky.social
keriothe
@keriothe.bsky.social
there is nothing at all apart from the things that happen
December 14, 2025 at 12:02 AM
You misspelled ‘too’.
December 12, 2025 at 11:15 PM
When I was a kid I remember Raquel Welch being a paragon of feminine beauty and I had no idea who she was.
December 7, 2025 at 10:06 AM
That’s fair but I would argue that his books also make my case.
December 5, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Neither have I - although I have tried.
December 5, 2025 at 7:00 PM
He was really good in The Night Manager tbf
December 5, 2025 at 6:57 PM
He doesn’t even have a degree in history and his books are terrible!
December 5, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Tom Holland isn’t a historian.
December 5, 2025 at 6:35 PM
But Peter will have to read this shit! I don’t* think I will enjoy that process.

*do
December 5, 2025 at 1:10 AM
Feels kind of unfair - borderline mean - to do this on IBCK.
a man wearing sunglasses and a green jacket is standing in a crowd and says `` do it '' .
ALT: a man wearing sunglasses and a green jacket is standing in a crowd and says `` do it '' .
media.tenor.com
December 4, 2025 at 10:57 PM
rootcrop cosmopolitans
December 3, 2025 at 12:45 PM
This clearly took an interesting turn.
December 3, 2025 at 11:33 AM
I track all my kids and they track me (and my wife). We all know where everyone is all the time. My eldest is 22. When they were younger we imposed it but now it's completely voluntary and nobody's bothered.
November 30, 2025 at 2:27 PM
"Barry: it's not all shit"
November 30, 2025 at 1:55 PM
This describes a lot of US journalism.
November 27, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Better get back to that, stop wasting your time with randoms on twit.. Bluesky!
November 27, 2025 at 1:54 AM
I apologise unreservedly for saying ‘gnomic’. I intended it humorously but if it landed badly that’s on me. Sorry.
November 27, 2025 at 1:50 AM
OK, well that was a little gnomic if I may say. But if this whole discussion was based on my misreading of your original point I will gladly admit it, I’ve found the discussion very stimulating and now I will go and read that piece you linked to properly.
November 27, 2025 at 1:40 AM
Completely agree with that.
November 27, 2025 at 1:33 AM
No I completely agree. But to go back to the original point, ‘developer has built over-specced apartment on which they are going to lose money’ is a symptom not a cause.
November 27, 2025 at 1:32 AM
💯
November 27, 2025 at 1:31 AM
That’s always been the case! Property building is a horribly cyclical business. Removing planning and regulatory constraints would help this in the long term.
November 27, 2025 at 1:30 AM
My point is that’s just the cycle, and there is something wrong in London housebuilding that is not just the cycle.
November 27, 2025 at 1:27 AM
A big part of it though is just the cycle. Prices have to adjust, people who have built flash pads will have to take a loss.
November 27, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Yes this partly refers to what I’m talking about - taxes, regulatory (affordable/social housing requirements) and planning constraints that make it too risky to build in London.
November 27, 2025 at 1:24 AM