@kevanhoffman.bsky.social
That’s fair. I thought he was pushed out because he wasn’t willing to tank. I had forgotten he clashed with some of the players. If the goal is to instill more discipline though, he should probably get a look
January 11, 2026 at 11:45 PM
That’s fair. I thought he was pushed out because he wasn’t willing to tank. I had forgotten he clashed with some of the players. If the goal is to instill more discipline though, he should probably get a look
In their 3 3Q drives that resulted in punts, they only ran the ball 3 times. A lot of the runs came in the 1H when they actually had a nice offensive rhythm.
I think the inability of the OL to open holes in the 2H and allow GB to run *more* and burn clock was a bigger issue than running too much
I think the inability of the OL to open holes in the 2H and allow GB to run *more* and burn clock was a bigger issue than running too much
January 11, 2026 at 2:07 PM
In their 3 3Q drives that resulted in punts, they only ran the ball 3 times. A lot of the runs came in the 1H when they actually had a nice offensive rhythm.
I think the inability of the OL to open holes in the 2H and allow GB to run *more* and burn clock was a bigger issue than running too much
I think the inability of the OL to open holes in the 2H and allow GB to run *more* and burn clock was a bigger issue than running too much
Run blocking was atrocious
January 11, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Run blocking was atrocious
I bet Stefanski would also be high on their list
January 11, 2026 at 1:50 PM
I bet Stefanski would also be high on their list
Brian Flores?
January 11, 2026 at 1:44 PM
Brian Flores?
That’s unfortunately CV’s standard level of effort these days
December 28, 2025 at 3:57 AM
That’s unfortunately CV’s standard level of effort these days
You could actually argue the opposite. IMO the broncos have gotten a lot of juice from their squeeze. The packers have left a lot unsqueezed.
November 7, 2025 at 1:13 PM
You could actually argue the opposite. IMO the broncos have gotten a lot of juice from their squeeze. The packers have left a lot unsqueezed.
Because Lefleur is unreasonably conservative. Don’t worry about the time and go try to win the game. The difference between is win and a tie is more significant than the difference between a tie and a loss imo
September 29, 2025 at 4:33 AM
Because Lefleur is unreasonably conservative. Don’t worry about the time and go try to win the game. The difference between is win and a tie is more significant than the difference between a tie and a loss imo
No reason he shouldn’t be a T10 TE in targets. Should be getting 6 targets per game on the low end
February 11, 2025 at 3:00 AM
No reason he shouldn’t be a T10 TE in targets. Should be getting 6 targets per game on the low end
Damn, I missed Wet Spot putting up 77.
February 9, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Damn, I missed Wet Spot putting up 77.
Sure, but the whole premise of Metcalf being on the trading block would be to clear cap space
January 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Sure, but the whole premise of Metcalf being on the trading block would be to clear cap space
Seahawks have cap issues - they’re not gonna take on a big salary.
January 22, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Seahawks have cap issues - they’re not gonna take on a big salary.
Not sure how the blame is split between Love and Lafleur, but collectively the offense panicked after the nightmare start. Half our WR room was in the infirmary by the time we settled into any kind of offensive rhythm. Was a winnable game even after spotting them 7 - just needed to stick to the plan
January 21, 2025 at 6:15 PM
Not sure how the blame is split between Love and Lafleur, but collectively the offense panicked after the nightmare start. Half our WR room was in the infirmary by the time we settled into any kind of offensive rhythm. Was a winnable game even after spotting them 7 - just needed to stick to the plan
For sure, but also F game from the packers. Bad turnovers, missed fg, dumb penalties
January 13, 2025 at 12:53 AM
For sure, but also F game from the packers. Bad turnovers, missed fg, dumb penalties
Nah, burkhardt messed that up. It was on the eagles. But it should’ve been 15 yards for interference, not 5 for illegal touching
January 12, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Nah, burkhardt messed that up. It was on the eagles. But it should’ve been 15 yards for interference, not 5 for illegal touching
And yet, Denver not getting a challenge off in time seems inexcusable in this day and age
January 12, 2025 at 8:52 PM
And yet, Denver not getting a challenge off in time seems inexcusable in this day and age
This is good stuff. Thanks 🙏
January 8, 2025 at 12:55 PM
This is good stuff. Thanks 🙏
Got it. Thanks.
January 7, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Got it. Thanks.
So correlates to basketball reference BPM2?
January 7, 2025 at 6:54 PM
So correlates to basketball reference BPM2?
Do these adjust for usage? No argument on Flagg, but Kneupel at number 2 is strange. A lot of guys with comparable ortgs at much higher usage. Where is Asa Newell?
January 7, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Do these adjust for usage? No argument on Flagg, but Kneupel at number 2 is strange. A lot of guys with comparable ortgs at much higher usage. Where is Asa Newell?
I think I read earlier this season that Fangio was transitioning to more man coverage than is traditionally his tendency - perhaps due to the emergence of quality young dbs. What should the packers expect in terms of man/zone splits? Watson’s impact on that?
January 7, 2025 at 6:30 PM
I think I read earlier this season that Fangio was transitioning to more man coverage than is traditionally his tendency - perhaps due to the emergence of quality young dbs. What should the packers expect in terms of man/zone splits? Watson’s impact on that?
Safe to say year one of Halfley was a success. Add an impactful edge rusher and a starter quality CB and we should be cooking in year two
January 6, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Safe to say year one of Halfley was a success. Add an impactful edge rusher and a starter quality CB and we should be cooking in year two
Can we quit taking the ball to start games? That’s fine if the offense is clicking, but it’s demoralizing when we end up chasing the game and having to kick off to start the second half
January 5, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Can we quit taking the ball to start games? That’s fine if the offense is clicking, but it’s demoralizing when we end up chasing the game and having to kick off to start the second half