Kevin Bonham
@kevinbonham.bsky.social
6.2K followers 210 following 3.7K posts
Psephologist, polling analyst and poll transparency advocate, political commentator, ecologist, chess player/admin. No party loyalties. Not-A-Pollster.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kevinbonham.bsky.social
This party was trying to get registered for this year's election but didn't get there in time.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
It is checked. A random sample of claimed members (a few to several dozen) are contacted to see if they will say they are actually members of the party. If too many say they're not then the party is not registered. That said the statistical test is fairly lenient.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
The application being published means it somehow managed to pass membership vetting to establish that it at least may really have 1500 members. Usually parties with websites as bad as P2P don't get near.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Party registration watch: because there is less than zero actual voter demand for yet another paranoid minor right party with a manifesto assembled from Ralph Babet's lost belly fluff, here is "Power 2 People" applying for registration, avoid.

aec.gov.au/Parties_and_...
aec.gov.au
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Wright is the current seat of interest. A direct swing of 5.2% from the LNP to One Nation would see One Nation win it. Some national polls have been close to this.

But Qld will be redistributed, with or without expansion.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Candidate S Ley has taken the lead in my sidebar Next Leader To Go Not-A-Poll
kevinbonham.bsky.social
I did not notice former Derwent Valley Mayor Ben Shaw had run for Sorell Council in 2022. Anyway he has now been elected to Sorell Council on a vacancy recount. #lgtas #politas

www.tec.tas.gov.au/local-govern...
www.tec.tas.gov.au
kevinbonham.bsky.social
There isn't a question on it, I'd expect engagement is not high right now.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
(For Richmond, I assumed ALP->Grn was the same as Ryan and that all other->Grn in Richmond was the same as all other->ALP in Richmond. I got Greens beating Nat but it was inside 51-49).
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Richmond is actually an interesting one because the ALP->Grn preference flow would presumably be much weaker than Grn->ALP. Despite the easy ALP 2PP win, by the time you throw in the 5.2% primary vote swing and that, the Nat would be not far off winning it.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Newspoll these days is less bouncy than it used to be so that may help him.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Close to half of Coalition voters follow how to vote cards and the Coalition currently recommends prefs to Labor over Greens on its cards. Among the rest not surprising that plenty of right-wing L-NP supporters would prefer the centrish ALP to lefter Greens.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
sorry, I typed that the wrong way round. will delete and repost.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
through the roof. during that streak it was between net +26 and +57
kevinbonham.bsky.social
I think the rest are right.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Greens also don't take Brisbane. They were 6.21 behind Labor at the 3CP point so taking 5.22 off Labor's primary still leaves Labor about a point ahead.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Greens do not take Macnamara, they're still third.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Not easily. Coalition prefs flow strongly to Labor over Greens at present so Labor vs Greens is probably something like 70-30
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Net -1 isn't popular, it's OK by modern standards though.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
Most Newspolls at 56 2PP or better in a row (includes derived estimates)

10 Labor (Rudd) Jan-Jun 08
6 Coalition (Howard) Mar-May 96
5 Labor (Rudd) Feb-Apr 09
4 Coalition (Howard) Oct-Nov 96
4 Labor (Rudd) July - Sep 08
4 LABOR (Albanese) JULY-OCT 25
kevinbonham.bsky.social
My polling aggregate following #Newspoll 56.5 to ALP (+0.3)
kevinbonham.bsky.social
#Newspoll 57-43 to ALP
ALP 37 L-NP 28 Green 12 ON 11 IND/other 12

Albanese net -1 (47-8)
Ley net -20 (31-51)
Better PM (favours incumbents) Albanese leads 52-30

Monday - Thursday, predates Hastie quitting shadow cabinet.
kevinbonham.bsky.social
I support expansion, within reason. It's been a long time, it will make for more manageable local representation, it might allow for more distinctive local outcomes, it will reduce malapportionment. This is not a partisan plot.