sure it's not the most logical, but it is still a distinction. A line had to be drawn somewhere, otherwise you get weird decks that have 8 card infinites, or 6 cards, or 4 cards, all being called bracket 3 because they just happen to go infinite with a goldilocks set up

"They will have no 2 card infinite combos". This is 3 cards so it's not something that is looked at for what bracket a deck is in.

Ready to hear this about cactaur for the next 4 months?

I'm not a fan of 2-3 card infinite combos, but I have a few decks with one just in case. Mostly I just try to have a few big "I win" buttons like overrun spells or one sided boardwipes

Yeah, still being removable and not being permanent are huge differences. Knowing that humiliation isn't permanent now is great but it's still a spell I am against existing in alchemy

Ya know, that does explain why it feels like I haven't seen that card in forever

It is no different from the unsets, I have no reason to play with someone trying to use them. Honestly in general I'm not against alchemy even when playing brawl on arena. The only exceptions are that white sorcery that can turn off a commander permanently and that green cat that makes lands

Change conjure to a token and sure. Most alchemy cards I don't agree with cause they physically don't work in physical magic but this one at least does with a minor change

Square has not made FFXIV a game that will last past it's servers closing. They have done nothing to show that they would make money from implementing this server

And there is better options for a company than developing on a failing game, like making a different game. It's pretty simple economics

Servers aren't free, this addition would not directly make money, how many FFXIV players actually want this system, would new players be interested in this system, dev time isn't free, being successful doesn't mean infinite money

I mean I get appreciating art, but a company isnt going to give their IP to other people to let them do this and if it financially doesn't make sense why would a company do it?

I agree live as service games shouldn't be lost to the sands of time when they close but there isnt really an alternative

Another client is rough, but I think the main issue they stated with Arena is playing Commander on a phone is just not feasible due to screen real estate

Realistically I think they should just put commander into arena but only accessible via the PC client

Pref physical for consoles when possible, but I will grab a digital game if needed for some reason like a game releasing while traveling or being digital only

If one is cheaper though I will go for it, which usually means grabbing older games as digital since they are on sale more

Currently I've been playing through every Kingdom Hearts game. Finished 1, Chain of Memories, and 2. Now I'm working through Birth By Sleep

Watched 358/2 days but I intend on finding a cartridge to play it later