Jason Kint
@kint.bsky.social
11K followers 930 following 1.3K posts
#HoldTheLine. Ask, think, translate tech/media strategy (subs, ads, video, monopolies, privacy, press freedom, trust) for @dcnorg.bsky.social to advance future of trusted news and entertainment. @jason_kint on X, 20yrs leading major sports sites
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kint.bsky.social
Good coverage by Press Gazette. Reporters should note the second "change" is actually in the Dept of Justice proposed search remedies for the imminent order out of DC court. Court had shared a desire to issue them by August. All eyes should be on an injunction to stop the ongoing harm ASAP. 1/2
kint.bsky.social
The Court snaps back at the suggestion the jury verdict in the Flo lawsuit had any jurors who were "irrationally crazed in their hatred of Meta." 2/3 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
kint.bsky.social
Amazing. Facebook trial is in two weeks for allegedly inflating its potential reach metrics and their attorneys admit to being concerned "that Meta is a widely hated and viled company" so jurors need to be screened for their hatred. Especially towards Mark Zuckerberg. 1/3
Reposted by Jason Kint
litbowl.bsky.social
They shouldn't feel comfortable given Chhabria's essentially opposite ruling. But hell, if they wanna dig their own graves even more blatantly and faster... bsky.app/profile/kint...
kint.bsky.social
And...yes. Another big AI decision. When a win is maybe not a win. The AI training is fair use cult may be very disappointed by Meta's Summary Judgment "victory" in its copyright suit. Be very very careful not to be spun by Meta's proxies and advocates.
READ THE ACTUAL OPINION CLOSELY. /1
kint.bsky.social
Yes. Not a big deal. Not a language actually used for anything being discussed either which is all in Java, JavaScript, and probably some python.
kint.bsky.social
They’re doing super well actually. This is sort irrelevant chatter.
kint.bsky.social
Are you talking about DOJ? I strongly disagree. They were disciplined in bringing the lawsuit, entirely up on the business and issues and are doing super well.
kint.bsky.social
Cringe moment from yesterday for me in US v Google was when Google’s attorney referenced a programming language (C#) as “C number sign” and then DOJ said “C hashtag” and the expert witness rightly jumped in respectfully and said “C sharp.”
kint.bsky.social
ps that was a true story. Every detail. #Holdtheline.
kint.bsky.social
The cameras were for upstairs. A grand jury was minutes away from indicting former FBI Director Jim Comey at Trump's command.
History split: one story ignored, another consuming all attention. Without realization of how unchecked monopoly power tears at all our institutions. 3/3
kint.bsky.social
As we push open the doors, a sea of cameras point our way. But they’re not for them. Certainly not for me.
Ironically, the remedies in this landmark case after multiple federal courts say Google rigged distribution and funding of the world’s media - barely make the news. 2/3
kint.bsky.social
Scene: I walk out of the Albert V. Bryan Courthouse next to two of the world’s top antitrust lawyers defending Google. Me? Seeking justice.

Both had left storied firm Paul Weiss only months ago after its settlement under heavy pressure from a flexing White House. 1/3
kint.bsky.social
20 seconds. The New York Times Daily this morning ends with the most important warning in this moment…by Pulitzer-prize winning reporter, Devlin Barrett. Highly recommend the entire episode, linked here. www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/p...
Reposted by Jason Kint
techoversight.bsky.social
📺 HAPPENING NOW: House Judiciary Republicans come out the gate with unequivocal support for a sweeping, broad AI moratorium, which will repeal laws protect kids and make CSAM illegal in states like in states like Alabama, Arizona, California, and more.
AI at a Crossroads: A Nationwide Strategy or Californication?
YouTube video by House Judiciary GOP
www.youtube.com
Reposted by Jason Kint
justinhendrix.bsky.social
While the EU debates tech sovereignty, the UK is rolling out the red carpet for Trump and US tech giants—making deals and importing infrastructure that serves America’s AI ambitions. Tech Policy Press fellow Megan Kirkwood asks, what does it portend for Britain’s future?
'Tech Prosperity Deal' Binds UK to US AI Dominance Strategy | TechPolicy.Press
It is clearer than ever that the UK is not pursuing any kind of meaningfully “sovereign” tech sector, writes Tech Policy Press fellow Megan Kirkwood.
www.techpolicy.press
Reposted by Jason Kint
michhham.bsky.social
Curious thread on the lawsuit that is claiming Google is abusing its monopoly, in this case its search monopoly. It’s an important suit for the open web, searchability, and the publishing industry.

It reminds me of how grateful I am Google never got to govern or develop Toronto’s Quayside.
kint.bsky.social
ok, this is HUGE. Late Friday, Penske (PMC) filed a wicked-smart, landmark antitrust lawsuit against Google. I've now read it in full and I'm very impressed. Importantly, it's the first antitrust suit for Google tying its AI-driven products to its adjudicated search monopoly. /1
kint.bsky.social
Bottom-line imho, it’s a very smart complaint bringing together DC circuit findings of fact tied now to G AI services where this is real-time harm underway. Susan Godfrey is the law firm! and notably they also have NYT v OpenAI. cc @dcnorg.bsky.social /15
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com
kint.bsky.social
And here is the tie (reciprocal dealing)... PMC alleges Google violates the Sherman Act by tying search referral traffic to PMC's free supply of content - for AI training, republishing, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
In other words, no content = no traffic. /14
kint.bsky.social
PMC calls its content a “golden corpus” for AI - meticulously researched and edited, making it ideal to train generative AI outputs.
But that value, PMC says, comes from massive investment - tens of millions/year in real journalism. Google pays $0 for it through the tie. /13
kint.bsky.social
Google’s search results design leaves publishers with no good choices:
(a) Opt out of AI use? You vanish from Search.
(b) Stay in? You hand over content for free.
The result: a “race to the bottom” where everyone’s coerced into supplying AI content - and only Google benefits. /12
kint.bsky.social
PMC outlines three forms of coerced content usage:
(1) Republishing in snippets
(2) Training LLMs
(3) Repurposing for RAG
All tied to access to search traffic - which Google monopolizes.
This bundling strategy, PMC argues, is illegal under antitrust law. /11
kint.bsky.social
“The open web is already in rapid decline.” - Google, in court filings we flagged last weekend.
PMC points to this as an admission that AI Overviews - by siphoning referral traffic - are accelerating the collapse of the open, ad-supported web. ergo, why it was so sensitive. /10
kint.bsky.social
And now this complaint was clearly being finalized up until the last week. It includes not only reporting by Digiday here on DCN's research as to the impact of Google AI Overviews and AI Mode on publishers of all types... /9