Kitty Dillinger
@kittydillinger.bsky.social
He really nailed the punchline at the end on that one.
January 26, 2026 at 7:29 PM
He really nailed the punchline at the end on that one.
DNC leadership need to resign. And many of the serving Dems (fetterman).
1/3 of the country is not independent, but about 1/3 of the country does not vote. Bet they wish they'd cast a ballot now. Elections are way easier than fighting for your rights in the streets.
1/3 of the country is not independent, but about 1/3 of the country does not vote. Bet they wish they'd cast a ballot now. Elections are way easier than fighting for your rights in the streets.
January 26, 2026 at 6:55 PM
DNC leadership need to resign. And many of the serving Dems (fetterman).
1/3 of the country is not independent, but about 1/3 of the country does not vote. Bet they wish they'd cast a ballot now. Elections are way easier than fighting for your rights in the streets.
1/3 of the country is not independent, but about 1/3 of the country does not vote. Bet they wish they'd cast a ballot now. Elections are way easier than fighting for your rights in the streets.
From the "party of small government" to this. You'd think Republicans would have questions for their leaders.
January 26, 2026 at 6:03 PM
From the "party of small government" to this. You'd think Republicans would have questions for their leaders.
The anemic response of the Dems is deafening. They sound like a parent counting to 3.
"1, 2, 2 1/2, 2 3/4,... 2.9, 2.99, 2.999...."
It's time they resign to make way for Americans willing to uphold the Constitution.
"1, 2, 2 1/2, 2 3/4,... 2.9, 2.99, 2.999...."
It's time they resign to make way for Americans willing to uphold the Constitution.
January 26, 2026 at 5:49 PM
The anemic response of the Dems is deafening. They sound like a parent counting to 3.
"1, 2, 2 1/2, 2 3/4,... 2.9, 2.99, 2.999...."
It's time they resign to make way for Americans willing to uphold the Constitution.
"1, 2, 2 1/2, 2 3/4,... 2.9, 2.99, 2.999...."
It's time they resign to make way for Americans willing to uphold the Constitution.
Was a regular target shopper in 2024. Stopped going when the boycott started, and never went back. Can't remember the last time I set foot in a target, and they haven't given me a single reason to return.
January 26, 2026 at 3:09 AM
Was a regular target shopper in 2024. Stopped going when the boycott started, and never went back. Can't remember the last time I set foot in a target, and they haven't given me a single reason to return.
I haven't seen a single governor meet the moment. The bar is SO LOW that it would only take an authentic reaction and call to action for a dem to stand out at this point. I can tell you I wouldn't vote for a single one of the "top Dems" in a primary.
January 24, 2026 at 7:07 PM
I haven't seen a single governor meet the moment. The bar is SO LOW that it would only take an authentic reaction and call to action for a dem to stand out at this point. I can tell you I wouldn't vote for a single one of the "top Dems" in a primary.
They should have laughed loudly in his face. Quietly laughing doesn't cut it.
Every weird ass thing he says and does needs to be pointed at and laughed at, loudly and publicly. No more polite society BS. If he farts or stinks or stumbles, laugh at him. It's the only thing dictators can't handle.
Every weird ass thing he says and does needs to be pointed at and laughed at, loudly and publicly. No more polite society BS. If he farts or stinks or stumbles, laugh at him. It's the only thing dictators can't handle.
January 22, 2026 at 4:16 AM
They should have laughed loudly in his face. Quietly laughing doesn't cut it.
Every weird ass thing he says and does needs to be pointed at and laughed at, loudly and publicly. No more polite society BS. If he farts or stinks or stumbles, laugh at him. It's the only thing dictators can't handle.
Every weird ass thing he says and does needs to be pointed at and laughed at, loudly and publicly. No more polite society BS. If he farts or stinks or stumbles, laugh at him. It's the only thing dictators can't handle.
Right?! They can't assert a power they don't have. Why does the media give them legitimacy? It's a blatant violation of our civil rights.
I hope after this there is enough backlash to legislate stricter rules and ban no knock raids altogether - those should have never been allowed.
I hope after this there is enough backlash to legislate stricter rules and ban no knock raids altogether - those should have never been allowed.
January 22, 2026 at 4:11 AM
Right?! They can't assert a power they don't have. Why does the media give them legitimacy? It's a blatant violation of our civil rights.
I hope after this there is enough backlash to legislate stricter rules and ban no knock raids altogether - those should have never been allowed.
I hope after this there is enough backlash to legislate stricter rules and ban no knock raids altogether - those should have never been allowed.
Where are all the lawyers? There's only a couple ever speaking up. Can the bar assoc organize pro bono work to fight these endless constitutional violations? Can states or counties expand public defenders' resources to offer help? I assume this is going to end up as class action suits.
January 22, 2026 at 4:05 AM
Where are all the lawyers? There's only a couple ever speaking up. Can the bar assoc organize pro bono work to fight these endless constitutional violations? Can states or counties expand public defenders' resources to offer help? I assume this is going to end up as class action suits.
I think most people will accept a hit to their 401k (if it even makes a difference at that point).
Look around at how far Americans can be pushed and remain inactive. I do not believe we can't tax billionaires bc it will make poor people upset. That objection is solvable. 7/7
Look around at how far Americans can be pushed and remain inactive. I do not believe we can't tax billionaires bc it will make poor people upset. That objection is solvable. 7/7
January 22, 2026 at 3:59 AM
I think most people will accept a hit to their 401k (if it even makes a difference at that point).
Look around at how far Americans can be pushed and remain inactive. I do not believe we can't tax billionaires bc it will make poor people upset. That objection is solvable. 7/7
Look around at how far Americans can be pushed and remain inactive. I do not believe we can't tax billionaires bc it will make poor people upset. That objection is solvable. 7/7
If you reduce the cost of shelter and healthcare, that lifts a major $ burden. If you do that, while holding these cartoonish villains accountable and restoring some semblance of fairness to the system, giving younger people the opportunity to buy into the system (housing, stock, etc.)... 6/
January 22, 2026 at 3:54 AM
If you reduce the cost of shelter and healthcare, that lifts a major $ burden. If you do that, while holding these cartoonish villains accountable and restoring some semblance of fairness to the system, giving younger people the opportunity to buy into the system (housing, stock, etc.)... 6/
If we go into it with a clear new deal style plan, retirees can get SS that actually covers cost of living, Medicare/Medicaid can be restored to reasonable costs (allow for cost negotiation, and maybe allow other Americans to buy into coverage 🤷), housing costs will come down. 5/
January 22, 2026 at 3:48 AM
If we go into it with a clear new deal style plan, retirees can get SS that actually covers cost of living, Medicare/Medicaid can be restored to reasonable costs (allow for cost negotiation, and maybe allow other Americans to buy into coverage 🤷), housing costs will come down. 5/
I expect by that point, the us markets will be off the rails. The threat of a mass sell off should be meaningless bc by taxing these assets and taking them back, we can fund programs to stabilize the rest of our financial lives.
I know - "What about the 401ks? Retirees will lose their money" 4/
I know - "What about the 401ks? Retirees will lose their money" 4/
January 22, 2026 at 3:43 AM
I expect by that point, the us markets will be off the rails. The threat of a mass sell off should be meaningless bc by taxing these assets and taking them back, we can fund programs to stabilize the rest of our financial lives.
I know - "What about the 401ks? Retirees will lose their money" 4/
I know - "What about the 401ks? Retirees will lose their money" 4/
And bc there's so few people in this new "trump tax" bracket, we can devote the IRS to checking auditing them. Annually, if necessary. All their shell corps, all the property they've taken, all the equity they've stolen. 3/
January 22, 2026 at 3:39 AM
And bc there's so few people in this new "trump tax" bracket, we can devote the IRS to checking auditing them. Annually, if necessary. All their shell corps, all the property they've taken, all the equity they've stolen. 3/
I don't want to hear a single "the rich will leave the country" or "the rich will hide their money" or "they'll have to sell stock and trigger a sell-off. NO. Not falling for it. If they want to move to the UAE, godspeed. They can't hide the money, bc we're taxing assets, and closing loopholes. 2/
January 22, 2026 at 3:35 AM
I don't want to hear a single "the rich will leave the country" or "the rich will hide their money" or "they'll have to sell stock and trigger a sell-off. NO. Not falling for it. If they want to move to the UAE, godspeed. They can't hide the money, bc we're taxing assets, and closing loopholes. 2/
So much for "transparency". Would be a shame if a patriot just leaked it.
I really do not understand how Jack Smith is prevented from saying what he knows when it's relevant to defending himself and upholding his own oath.
What rule of law are we clinging to at this point?
I really do not understand how Jack Smith is prevented from saying what he knows when it's relevant to defending himself and upholding his own oath.
What rule of law are we clinging to at this point?
January 21, 2026 at 3:28 AM
So much for "transparency". Would be a shame if a patriot just leaked it.
I really do not understand how Jack Smith is prevented from saying what he knows when it's relevant to defending himself and upholding his own oath.
What rule of law are we clinging to at this point?
I really do not understand how Jack Smith is prevented from saying what he knows when it's relevant to defending himself and upholding his own oath.
What rule of law are we clinging to at this point?
He doesn't have to worry about re-election either. There's no excuse of needing to walk a fine line so he doesn't alienate a voter group. He could be way more vocal, go out into the streets, do an official stream of what is really happening, show the many kinds of damage it is causing the state.
January 20, 2026 at 7:26 PM
He doesn't have to worry about re-election either. There's no excuse of needing to walk a fine line so he doesn't alienate a voter group. He could be way more vocal, go out into the streets, do an official stream of what is really happening, show the many kinds of damage it is causing the state.
Yes! The claims complexity is ridiculous. When the simple act of paying a doctor bill creates multiple industries who only serve to make that transaction harder, there is something very wrong. Claims coding and 3rd party/subrogation checks are entire industries that just add cost.
January 17, 2026 at 3:29 AM
Yes! The claims complexity is ridiculous. When the simple act of paying a doctor bill creates multiple industries who only serve to make that transaction harder, there is something very wrong. Claims coding and 3rd party/subrogation checks are entire industries that just add cost.
In a reasonable world, that's a reasonable approach. Unfortunately, the wealthy use that to pacify us with crumbs while they get richer. Look at the ACA - it was the "reasonable" 1st step towards healthcare for all. And now we see it's just a windfall for conglomerates and we got screwed.
January 17, 2026 at 12:06 AM
In a reasonable world, that's a reasonable approach. Unfortunately, the wealthy use that to pacify us with crumbs while they get richer. Look at the ACA - it was the "reasonable" 1st step towards healthcare for all. And now we see it's just a windfall for conglomerates and we got screwed.
Spending a bunch of political capital to raise minimum wage to a level that people can't survive on is performative. If it passes, the govt pats themselves on the back for "doing something". Meanwhile people still can't afford to live.
Min wage is broken - change the way it's calculated.
Min wage is broken - change the way it's calculated.
January 16, 2026 at 8:33 PM
Spending a bunch of political capital to raise minimum wage to a level that people can't survive on is performative. If it passes, the govt pats themselves on the back for "doing something". Meanwhile people still can't afford to live.
Min wage is broken - change the way it's calculated.
Min wage is broken - change the way it's calculated.
What is the standard for defamation? If you intentionally mislead the public using a partial quote with no punctuation to change the meaning of it... That kinda seems like there maybe something there? It's worth a try to staunch the disinfo.
January 16, 2026 at 4:36 PM
What is the standard for defamation? If you intentionally mislead the public using a partial quote with no punctuation to change the meaning of it... That kinda seems like there maybe something there? It's worth a try to staunch the disinfo.
The 100 mile "border zone" needs to be rolled back. Whatever agency takes over border control next should not get unfettered ability to violate civil rights 100 miles into the country.
And ANY agent must be in uniform with identifiers. Plainclothes/unmarked car requires a judge sign off.
And ANY agent must be in uniform with identifiers. Plainclothes/unmarked car requires a judge sign off.
January 16, 2026 at 4:28 PM
The 100 mile "border zone" needs to be rolled back. Whatever agency takes over border control next should not get unfettered ability to violate civil rights 100 miles into the country.
And ANY agent must be in uniform with identifiers. Plainclothes/unmarked car requires a judge sign off.
And ANY agent must be in uniform with identifiers. Plainclothes/unmarked car requires a judge sign off.
I appreciate the list, bc it shows you're trying to focus on solutions, but I'd change #1. Tie minimum wage to a CoL metric vs a fixed number. $12/hr won't fix minimum wage. With a gross take home of less than $2000/mo, you can barely even get just housing for that today let alone in 4 years.
January 16, 2026 at 4:16 PM
I appreciate the list, bc it shows you're trying to focus on solutions, but I'd change #1. Tie minimum wage to a CoL metric vs a fixed number. $12/hr won't fix minimum wage. With a gross take home of less than $2000/mo, you can barely even get just housing for that today let alone in 4 years.
I think the American people got screwed.
Biden wasn't the worst president, but he, his admin, and the DNC utterly failed at communicating effectively, engaging the public, and creating a line up of potential successors. He's prob a decent guy, but he's not a leader, and it screwed us.
Biden wasn't the worst president, but he, his admin, and the DNC utterly failed at communicating effectively, engaging the public, and creating a line up of potential successors. He's prob a decent guy, but he's not a leader, and it screwed us.
January 14, 2026 at 2:21 AM
I think the American people got screwed.
Biden wasn't the worst president, but he, his admin, and the DNC utterly failed at communicating effectively, engaging the public, and creating a line up of potential successors. He's prob a decent guy, but he's not a leader, and it screwed us.
Biden wasn't the worst president, but he, his admin, and the DNC utterly failed at communicating effectively, engaging the public, and creating a line up of potential successors. He's prob a decent guy, but he's not a leader, and it screwed us.