Mainly I just want something larger, old twitter had broad and deep perspectives from so many people; it felt like a reasonable cross-section of the world's social-media-engaging population both within and outside academia. Bluesky is narrow and shallow in comparison.

To be clear, quant research can be super flawed and limited, and qual research can open our eyes to ways in which our quant measures, research questions, and study designs should be improved. But the best qualitative research is still extraordinarily limited epistemologically.

Agree. In case it was ambiguous, my reply was nodding along with you (and lamenting the lack of skepticism you are requesting even though it’s warranted).

I feel like even 10 years ago scientists on social media were slightly more immune to ingroup and confirmation type biases than others. But those days seem over: increasingly there is implicit agreement on what beliefs/conclusions are acceptable, and skepticism and evidence are applied accordingly.

Think you’re reading into this too much, some of the 7 teams that called might have been exploring interest in advisory roles or assistant coach positions — which many former head coaches take before their next head coach job.

I haven’t seen stranger things. Yet feel compelled to answer star wars episode 1.

My son is reading that (the former) right now ☺️

Link: www.zurinstitute.com/webinars/und...