book reviews & discussion of Ming-Qing literature, science fiction, etc. https://www.patreon.com/kmichaelwilson
At this point, I have no idea what it means to be "Proustian," or rather, what I now regard as "Proustian" is not something one necessarily would... want to be, or casually reference
At this point, I have no idea what it means to be "Proustian," or rather, what I now regard as "Proustian" is not something one necessarily would... want to be, or casually reference
At this point, I have no idea what it means to be "Proustian," or rather, what I now regard as "Proustian" is not something one necessarily would... want to be, or casually reference
At this point, I have no idea what it means to be "Proustian," or rather, what I now regard as "Proustian" is not something one necessarily would... want to be, or casually reference
Also, what's the best TV representation? Anything good?
Also, what's the best TV representation? Anything good?
Nor should we want them to be
Nor should we want them to be
I think the genuinely dialectical nature of historical progress is throwing us all for a loop
it's genuinely the case that, e.g., Frankenstein (1818) only "became science fiction" in the 20th C., but it's difficult to internalize these kinds of "retroactive truths"
I think the genuinely dialectical nature of historical progress is throwing us all for a loop
it's genuinely the case that, e.g., Frankenstein (1818) only "became science fiction" in the 20th C., but it's difficult to internalize these kinds of "retroactive truths"
whereas the latter work never sold well, never will sell well, but is precisely what literate people most care about when they say they care about sci-fi
whereas the latter work never sold well, never will sell well, but is precisely what literate people most care about when they say they care about sci-fi