Kathryn Weber-Boer
@kowb.bsky.social
770 followers 620 following 380 posts
Enjoys digging into data about science, a good principled argument, and human dignity. Super annoyed by disinformation and anything that hurts researchers or knowledge. Sometime archaeologist (I like animal bones...)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Kathryn Weber-Boer
digital-science.com
Digital Science CEO Dr Daniel Hook @dwh.bsky.social says: “We’re excited to see Professor Wang leveraging both Dimensions and Altmetric to deliver a high-quality “multifaceted impact analysis framework”.

@dimensions.ai @altmetric.com

4/10
Reposted by Kathryn Weber-Boer
gvaughnjoy.bsky.social
Can we just admire Jane Fonda, please? She is a true patriot, inspiration, and role model.

"When I feel scared, I look to history. I wish there were a secret playbook with all the answers — but there never has been. The only thing that has ever worked — time and time again — is solidarity."
Text from the Variety article on the sub quoted piece:

In a letter inviting her peers to join the re-established group, Fonda writes: "I'm 87 years old. I've seen war, repression, protest, and backlash. I've been celebrated, and I've been branded an enemy of the state. But I can tell you this: this is the most frightening moment of my life. When I feel scared, I look to history. I wish there were a secret playbook with all the answers — but there never has been. The only thing that has ever worked — time and time again — is solidarity: binding together, finding bravery in numbers too big to ignore, and standing up for one another."
kowb.bsky.social
I know... so sad. I had hoped the first post I saw was fake 😔
kowb.bsky.social
Mine is subject-meets-quality organized.
kowb.bsky.social
Tell me that was the AI session I missed.
kowb.bsky.social
Same! My phone is also behaving SO slowly. But yes, pages taking forever to load, links not working...
Reposted by Kathryn Weber-Boer
kowb.bsky.social
To answer my own question: by including links in the metadata?
kowb.bsky.social
But how do you track these distinct events without a unique identifier?
kowb.bsky.social
I feel I should cite @carolegoble.bsky.social, @evomri.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy (because isn't this also a bit about nano-publications?), and Michael Goedike on that last post 😅
kowb.bsky.social
I've been learning a lot recently about object bundles (RO-Crates, RDM Containers, etc), and perhaps we need to start thinking of even the textual output as an assembly of recordable documents? It's conceptually satisfying, and a "top-level" identifier could be interesting.
kowb.bsky.social
That said, there are a lot of stakeholders with widely varying data literacy, and given the confusion around things like patent families or dataset versioning, I think it's important to consider the other work this might oblige us to do. 3/3
kowb.bsky.social
What makes this (or the datasets question) different is that the same form of identifier--DOI--would be multiple. In principle, I think this is a manageable challenge, as long as "we" adjust our expectations of the data and keep clean metadata linking related IDs (or ID packages). 2/n
kowb.bsky.social
I was thinking about this with datasets a week ago (with no conclusion reached in my own mind there either): *is* there an existential problem with multiple identifiers pointing to the same object? In many ways, we already do this (Dimensions, PubMed, Crossref/DataCite all have unique IDs). 1/n
kowb.bsky.social
🤔 musing here, so it's just a thought, but... if the publication is edited/revised in light of reviewer/editor comments, and hosted on MetaROR, then it would be appropriate to register a new DOI? (with metadata indicating the preprint DOI registered on preprint server, of course!)
kowb.bsky.social
Well... probably not all of them are entirely fake. That's *sort of* what the research suggested...
kowb.bsky.social
I don't think there's a need to mint a new DOI in MetaROR. The enrichment is seen in the appearance of the new DOIs associated with the reviews and editorial comment. Those presumably link to the original preprint in their metadata, right?

Not all publications of type 'article' are peer reviewed.
kowb.bsky.social
Will Google require me to log in again once I wait for the pending files to finish downloading so I can check which file number I was on? (Because counting tells me I was at 52, which I'm pretty sure is wrong.)

Absolutely.
kowb.bsky.social
I have a proposal for a new diagnostic technique for ADHD (can also be used to measure effectiveness of medication and non-pharmaceutical interventions): Google Photos takeout with 63 files of 2 GB each.

Is it physically painful? Yes.
At what number did I interrupt the process? 47... I think 🤔
kowb.bsky.social
Playing "whose notification is going to remind me of this task I need to do" with colleagues. 😉

Why can't Gemini do *this* part?