Peter Kjær Kruse-Andersen
@kruse-andersen.bsky.social
46 followers 19 following 18 posts
Assistant professor, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. Research: Economics of Climate Change , Environmental Economics, and Economic Growth. Main interests: economics, politics, and aircrafts.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
🚨Working Paper Alert

We ask: can circular economy policies backfire?

In a macroeconomic model, we show that circular economy policies (e.g., increased recycling) may backfire in the sense that they increase virgin natural resource use

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Is Recycling Wasted? Circular Economy and the Material Rebound Effect
We investigate how circular economy policies-such as increased recycling or reduced waste generation-affect primary (virgin) natural resource use at the macro l
papers.ssrn.com
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
Publication alert! 🚨

10 years in the making!

Main takeaways:
💡 A stricter environmental policy unambiguously reduces economic growth
💡 But the effect is highly non-linear
💡 Economic growth barely affected by realistic environmental policy changes

doi.org/10.1016/j.en...
Redirecting
doi.org
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
Our numerical simulations show that our tax-subsidy scheme could provide a welfare gain of around 0.3 percent of national income if politicians have a strong aversion to carbon leakage

End of 🧵

12/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
While the uniform carbon tax ensures a domestic emission reduction target, the other instruments depend on the politicians’ aversion to leakage

With no aversion to leakage, only a uniform carbon tax is needed

11/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(7) Tax on domestic production of fossil fuels

Intuition: reducing domestic production increases net imports, thereby increasing the international price of fossil fuels and thereby decreasing foreign consumption

10/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(6) Subsidy to green energy production

Intuition: increasing domestic production reduces net imports, thereby reducing the international price of green energy and thereby increasing foreign consumption, resulting in lower fossil fuel use

9/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(5) Tax on green energy consumption

Intuition: increasing domestic production reduces net imports, thereby reducing the international price of green energy and thereby increasing foreign consumption, resulting in lower fossil fuel use

8/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(4) Consumption taxes on all non-energy goods

Intuition: reduction in domestic consumption reduces net imports, thereby reducing the international price of green energy and thereby increasing foreign consumption, resulting in lower fossil fuel use

7/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(3) Location subsidies to all non-energy sectors

Intuition: counteract leakage at the extensive intensive margin by reducing the profit loss from regulation

6/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(2) Output subsidies to all non-energy sectors

Intuition: counteract leakage at the intensive margin by increasing international competitiveness

5/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
(1) A uniform carbon tax on households and all non-energy sectors

Intuition: equalize marginal abatement costs across sectors and ensures a domestic emissions target

4/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
Our general equilibrium model prescribes an intuitive tax-subsidy scheme with 7 elements…

3/N
kruse-andersen.bsky.social
As a novel feature, we distinguish between leakage at the extensive margin, where domestic firms relocate to foreign countries, and leakage at the intensive margin, where domestic firms lose world market shares

2/N
Reposted by Peter Kjær Kruse-Andersen