K. T. Petty
@ktp128.bsky.social
Reposted by K. T. Petty
I remain committed to reject the construct of a war crime because there is no war. However, even under the Administration’s position this is plainly a war crime.
December 5, 2025 at 9:47 PM
I remain committed to reject the construct of a war crime because there is no war. However, even under the Administration’s position this is plainly a war crime.
Reposted by K. T. Petty
5/ source (Gift Link):
Video of Boat Strike Shows Survivors Waving Before Fatal Follow-Up Attack
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/u...
Video of Boat Strike Shows Survivors Waving Before Fatal Follow-Up Attack
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/u...
Video of Boat Strike Shows Survivors Waving Before Fatal Follow-Up Attack
www.nytimes.com
December 5, 2025 at 8:03 PM
5/ source (Gift Link):
Video of Boat Strike Shows Survivors Waving Before Fatal Follow-Up Attack
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/u...
Video of Boat Strike Shows Survivors Waving Before Fatal Follow-Up Attack
www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/u...
Reposted by K. T. Petty
2/2 On the latter point about POTUS needing affirmative authorization, big recommend:
Dissecting the Trump Administration’s Effort to Circumvent the War Powers Resolution for Boat Strikes
By @bcfinucane.bsky.social
Dissecting the Trump Administration’s Effort to Circumvent the War Powers Resolution for Boat Strikes
By @bcfinucane.bsky.social
Dissecting the Trump Administration’s Effort to Circumvent the War Powers Resolution for Boat Strikes
Analysis of Trump administration's claim that War Powers Resolution's regulating US troops in "hostilities" does not apply to boat strikes.
www.justsecurity.org
December 5, 2025 at 8:29 PM
2/2 On the latter point about POTUS needing affirmative authorization, big recommend:
Dissecting the Trump Administration’s Effort to Circumvent the War Powers Resolution for Boat Strikes
By @bcfinucane.bsky.social
Dissecting the Trump Administration’s Effort to Circumvent the War Powers Resolution for Boat Strikes
By @bcfinucane.bsky.social
Reposted by K. T. Petty
Everyone from Hegseth down to the fellow who hit the button to fire the missile committed at least a double-murder following a manifestly unlawful order that is used *as the example* of a manifestly unlawful order.
They should all go to jail, presumably for life (I don't support the death penalty).
They should all go to jail, presumably for life (I don't support the death penalty).
December 5, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Everyone from Hegseth down to the fellow who hit the button to fire the missile committed at least a double-murder following a manifestly unlawful order that is used *as the example* of a manifestly unlawful order.
They should all go to jail, presumably for life (I don't support the death penalty).
They should all go to jail, presumably for life (I don't support the death penalty).
Reposted by K. T. Petty
I really don't know what else to write about these details we're getting.
These strikes were already illegal, but even if they were legal, the follow-up strike would still be murder and thus potentially a death penalty offense.
What else is there to say?
These strikes were already illegal, but even if they were legal, the follow-up strike would still be murder and thus potentially a death penalty offense.
What else is there to say?
December 5, 2025 at 8:32 PM
I really don't know what else to write about these details we're getting.
These strikes were already illegal, but even if they were legal, the follow-up strike would still be murder and thus potentially a death penalty offense.
What else is there to say?
These strikes were already illegal, but even if they were legal, the follow-up strike would still be murder and thus potentially a death penalty offense.
What else is there to say?