Not everyone has the discipline to be a scientist.

Where should evidence be evaluated? Because that's usually done in a court.

You may be owed compensation.

"It's much easier than going through the courts"

Cool, so if you're declared a terrorist by the next administration, I'm sure you'll be cool with no proof and summary execution, right?

Moron.

Aren't groups that perform extrajudicial killings called "death squads"?

Without evidence? They're just humans. When we try them in court, we're able to establish facts and potentially dismantle organizations.

Or we can just keep blowing up boats from one of the smaller suppliers of cocaine to act all big and tough and provide cover for a war no one wants.

And how long is the president legally allowed to have the military kill people before he has to report to Congress?

From 1986 until 2024, how many suspected drug runners did the Navy kill?