It's just an umbrella term which includes other chronophilias as opposed to just attraction to pre-pubescent children.

> With how they advocate for the normalization of what YOU call "Minor Attracted Persons" […]

The suffocating stigma they face *increases* harm to children because it keeps them from getting dignified, safe therapy that they might need to not offend. Among other reasons.

> Gee, I wonder why Jeremy Malcolm, executive director of Prostasia thinks exactly like this.

Probably because nobody is harmed in its creation or consumption, and it gives MAPs a safe outlet for their attractions.

I don't really follow blue sky politics but I'm trans and not okay with transphobia. If it's as you say, then I'll denounce those people. But as a rule, lolicons are just a demographic; bigotry, intersectional as it is, can be found in any demographic.

Nothing? These are my honest opinions.

Why the scare quotes

i was talking about pedophiles, not child sexual offenders

Hmm I'd just call them pedophiles, or better yet, MAPs. I don't see a need for the -sexual suffix. Bummer about the transphobia.

Also there's nothing wrong with being a lolicon 😙🧃

How is Prostasia transmisogynistic?

You can use this @fightforthefuture.org tool to easily tell your state legislators to oppose mandatory ID check laws. www.stoponlineidchecks.org

Favorite sign so far

😔