Jean-Michel Lapointe
@lapointejm.bsky.social
270 followers 520 following 37 posts
Chargé de projets pédagonumériques et wikimédien en résidence à l'UQAM. Montréal, Québec. Ambassadeur de Wikipédia et des projets Wikimédia dans le milieu de la recherche et de l'éducation.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Jean-Michel Lapointe
lapointejm.bsky.social
Nouveau bouquin de Marcello Vitali-Rosati que j’ai très hâte de lire : « C’est la matière qui pense -
Pour une philosophie de l’édition »

ceen.univ-rouen.fr/matiere-marc...
C'est la matière qui pense
ceen.univ-rouen.fr
Reposted by Jean-Michel Lapointe
edzitron.com
I wrote about this in this week's newsletter. I seriously believe one of the main reasons ChatGPT grew is that Google Search both failed to meaningfully innovate, especially in how it answered a user's query, and eventually deteriorated into something worse.
www.wheresyoured.at/reality-check/
This Bubble Was Also Inflated By The Failure of Google Search

Everybody I talk to that uses ChatGPT regularly uses it as either a way to generate shitty limericks or as a replacement for Google search, a product that Google has deliberately made worse as a means of increasing profits.

ChatGPT is, if I'm honest, better at processing search strings than Google Search, which is not so much a sign that ChatGPT is good at something as it is that Google has stopped innovating in any meaningful way. Over time, Google Search should've become something that was able to interpret your searches into the perfect result, which would require the company to improve how it processes your requests. Instead, Google Search has become dramatically worse, mostly because the company's incentives changed from "help people find something on the web" to "funnel as much traffic and show as many ad impressions as possible on Google.com." By this point, Google Search should have been more magical, more capable of taking a dimwitted question and turning it into a great answer, with said answer being a result on the internet. Note that nothing I'm writing here is actually about generating a result — it's about processing a user's query and presenting an answer, the very foundation of computing and the thing that Google, at one point, was the best in the world at doing. Thanks to Prabhakar Raghavan, the former head of ads that led a coup to become head of search, Google was pulled away from being a meaningful source of information.

And I'd argue that ChatGPT filled that void by doing the thing that people wanted Google Search to do: answer a question, even if the user isn't really sure how to ask it. Google Search has become clunky, obfuscatory, putting the burden of using the service on the user rather than helping fill the gap between query and answer in any meaningful way. Google's AI summaries don't even try to do what ChatGPT does — they generate summaries based on search results and say "okay man, uhh, is this what you want?"
Reposted by Jean-Michel Lapointe
wired.com
WIRED @wired.com · Mar 27
Nearly 35 years ago, Paul Ginsparg created arXiv, a digital repository where researchers could share their latest findings before they had been systematically reviewed or verified. If arXiv stopped functioning, scientists would suffer an immediate and profound disruption.
Inside arXiv—the Most Transformative Platform in All of Science
Modern science wouldn’t exist without the online research repository known as arXiv. Three decades in, its creator still can’t let it go.
www.wired.com
Reposted by Jean-Michel Lapointe
zephoria.bsky.social
When politicians ban books, I read them. So when I heard that Meta - who, of course, believes in free speech - is using egregious legal tactics to silence a former employee's book, my eyebrows went up. Who else is reading "Careless People" just cuz Meta is suing? www.nytimes.com/2025/03/12/t...
Meta Seeks to Block Further Sales of Ex-Employee’s Scathing Memoir
An arbitrator has prevented the employee from promoting her book and disparaging the company until private arbitration concludes.
www.nytimes.com
lapointejm.bsky.social
Wikipedia is a bastion of transparency, punctiliousness, and accessible knowledge.

So maybe it should come as no surprise that Elon Musk has lately taken time from his busy schedule of dismantling the federal government to attack Wikipedia.

www.newyorker.com/news/the-led...
Elon Musk Also Has a Problem with Wikipedia
Lately, Musk’s beef has merged with a general conviction on the right that the site is biased against conservatives.
www.newyorker.com
Reposted by Jean-Michel Lapointe
larevuedesmedias.bsky.social
⚡ « Le Point » contre Wikipédia : on fait le point sur la mécanique du conflit en cours 👇
larevuedesmedias.ina.fr/nod...