Pour les plus friands de détails techniques mais pas forcément anglophones, j’ai aussi concocté un tableau résumant les résultats de l’analyse des chercheurs, à découvrir ici : datawrapper.dwcdn.net/Ea0qo/13/

My post is mainly about the thumbnails above and below. The videos from the Times Radio actually show good reporting. But I feel like many people seeing these thumbnails will immediately believe "The Times is claiming it comes from the Kremlin." (5/5)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPoe...

Journalists (and politicians) have a responsibility to avoid amplifying unproven claims, no matter how tempting the headline. Let’s demand evidence-first reporting, even when the story is breaking. (4/5)

I understand why this framing exists: The Lib Dems’ statement is newsworthy, and Putin’s image drives clicks. But at this stage, I believe there is no public evidence linking Russia (or any state actor) to this attack. (3/5)

news.sky.com/story/cyber-...

But when a major outlet like The Times frames the story with Vladimir Putin’s face, amplifying the Lib Dems’ call for the government to disclose Kremlin involvement, it risks prioritizing engagement over evidence. (2/5)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZ_3...

📰 Read the full article here: www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news-feature...