Sebastian Lehmann
@lehmannsj.bsky.social
80 followers 200 following 8 posts
Research Scientist at Corneil Lab @Western University | NHP ephys | invasive & non-invasive brain stimulation
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sebastian Lehmann
jonathanamichaels.bsky.social
The neural control & computation lab is recruiting!

If you're interested in using large-scale neural population recordings to study how the brain learns to produce complex and flexible behaviours, please get in touch.

www.ncclab.ca
lehmannsj.bsky.social
We’re delighted to share that our cTBS study is now published in Brain Stimulation! /w @brian-corneil.bsky.social

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Thanks to all reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive feedback!
lehmannsj.bsky.social
We're excited to share our new paper: “cTBS of prefrontal cortex in the behaving macaque: no evidence for within-target inhibition or cross-hemisphere disinhibition of neural activity”
tinyurl.com/cTBSPFCNHP
w/ @brian-corneil.bsky.social

What did we find? Mostly... what we didn’t! 🧵
tinyurl.com
lehmannsj.bsky.social
Takeaway: In line with recent publications of others, these null results further challenge core assumptions about cTBS. They also highlight the importance of reporting negative findings, especially in NHP work.

📄 Read the full paper here: tinyurl.com/cTBSPFCNHP
Any feedback is highly appreciated!
tinyurl.com
lehmannsj.bsky.social
Despite some evidence of cTBS impacting neural activity, those effects didn’t translate into expected inhibition/disinhibition patterns - or behavior. We discuss possible reasons for this: task sensitivity, protocol choices, and the challenge of probing timescale network effects in PFC.
lehmannsj.bsky.social
Contralateral neural spiking: we found no evidence for disinhibition in left PFC after cTBS to the right PFC. Effects were minimal and no stronger than after SHAM or M1 stimulation.
lehmannsj.bsky.social
Error rates: No reliable differences after cTBS-PFC vs. cTBS-SHAM / M1
RTs: No consistent effects on general RT distribution, RT trends over time, or within session change
Peak velocity: Only small effects, but not specific to cTBS-PFC.
lehmannsj.bsky.social
In 80 daily sessions, we looked for changes in behavior (saccade RT, error rates, peak velocity) as well as spiking in contralateral PFC.
TLDR: we found no clear behavioral or neural evidence that cTBS-PFC caused inhibition or disinhibition.
lehmannsj.bsky.social
We tested a key assumption in TMS research: cTBS inhibits the targeted area and disinhibits its contralateral homologue. We had two 🐒 perform a pro/anti-saccade task and applied cTBS to right PFC, M1, or as a SHAM control and recorded spiking activity in the left PFC before and after.
lehmannsj.bsky.social
We're excited to share our new paper: “cTBS of prefrontal cortex in the behaving macaque: no evidence for within-target inhibition or cross-hemisphere disinhibition of neural activity”
tinyurl.com/cTBSPFCNHP
w/ @brian-corneil.bsky.social

What did we find? Mostly... what we didn’t! 🧵
tinyurl.com