Matthew Leisten
@leistenecon.bsky.social
1.1K followers 410 following 130 posts
Economist at FTC. IO, antitrust, pricing. Theory to empirics and back. Foodie. All views my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
leistenecon.bsky.social
🚨 #EconSky New paper! There's been much advocacy for “open” or “open-weights” AI models. But what are the equilibrium predictions relative to closed AI or a social planner? The econ of AI is new and distinct from other software, so we need new models. That’s where I come in!
leistenecon.bsky.social
We hope this paper offers policymakers important guidance about the winners and losers from privacy regulation and how it interacts w/ multiproduct monopoly.

Big lesson: focus on ways to protect poorer consumers' privacy specifically!
leistenecon.bsky.social
Last: what if consumers don't like their data being *used* for ads? We show that this can lead to the poorest & wealthiest consumers being made better off, but the lower-middle class is harmed.
leistenecon.bsky.social
Second: what if consumers intrinsically value privacy? Doesn't change their choices, but privacy regulation shifts everybody's preferences upward. If the wealthy value their privacy more than the poor, then privacy policy becomes even more regressive (but obviously good for CS)
leistenecon.bsky.social
We explore 3 extensions. First: what if wealthy eyeballs are more valuable than poor ones to advertisers? Turns out everything goes through *if* wealthy eyeball profitability is most impacted by privacy regulation.
leistenecon.bsky.social
Who gains? Inframarginal premium consumers (wealthy) who pay lower p. Who loses? Inframarginal free consumers (poor) who face higher a. Distributionally bad! We show this using my (Leisten 2024) "inequality-adjusted consumer surplus"
leistenecon.bsky.social
Privacy regulation worsens targeting, lowers advertiser WTP, and induces the platform to *shift* users from ad-supported to premium by raising a & lowering p

(This is only true in a "full coverage separating equilibrium" which we define and provide conditions for in the paper)
leistenecon.bsky.social
We build a simple model:
- Poorer consumers have lower (higher) marginal aversion to ads (spending money)
- Monopoly freemium platform chooses ad load (a) and premium price (p)
- Profits are premium revenue plus ad-revenue, which is per-eyeball advertiser WTP * number of eyeballs
leistenecon.bsky.social
Freemium: a free ad-supported version and a paid ad-free version, is everywhere these days. Youtube, Spotify, Netflix, etc.

Why offer the ad-supported version? You can get price-sensitive (poorer) customers but still monetize their attention
leistenecon.bsky.social
#EconSky 🚨NEW PAPER with Ben Casner:

We present a theory of why privacy regulation can be distributionally bad when platforms offer freemium models
leistenecon.bsky.social
Never figured you to be an MMT guy but ok
leistenecon.bsky.social
#EconSky My first publication is looking like it might be a good one!
leistenecon.bsky.social
What people think I'm doing when I say I'm "working on my egg paper" vs what I'm actually doing
leistenecon.bsky.social
"We thank the anonymous referees for their constructive feedback. In addressing their comments, we feel we have significantly improved the soup"
leistenecon.bsky.social
#EconSky Note: my online seminar on "Open(?) AI" has been **rescheduled** to Jan 27 because of the holiday. Thread describing the paper below!

bsky.app/profile/leis...
leistenecon.bsky.social
🚨 #EconSky New paper! There's been much advocacy for “open” or “open-weights” AI models. But what are the equilibrium predictions relative to closed AI or a social planner? The econ of AI is new and distinct from other software, so we need new models. That’s where I come in!
Reposted by Matthew Leisten
leistenecon.bsky.social
📉📈 I'm giving a (virtual) talk on "Open(?) AI" hosted by BU Questrom next month! Details/registration at the link, description of the paper below!

www.bu.edu/dbi/events/o...

bsky.app/profile/did:...
leistenecon.bsky.social
Made my schedule for #ASSA2025! Fully expecting to be able to attend all these sessions by bending time and logic to my will
leistenecon.bsky.social
#EconSky I'll be at ASSAs next week! Feel free to hit me up if you want to drink coffee and chat research, and be sure to check out this exciting, inter-field session I organized:
leistenecon.bsky.social
📉📈 I'm giving a (virtual) talk on "Open(?) AI" hosted by BU Questrom next month! Details/registration at the link, description of the paper below!

www.bu.edu/dbi/events/o...

bsky.app/profile/did:...
leistenecon.bsky.social
Weird best response function
Reposted by Matthew Leisten
assameeting.bsky.social
Don't forget to register for the #ASSA2025 Annual Meeting in San Francisco! Early bird registration ends tomorrow, Dec. 3. Register now! #econsky aeaweb.org/conference/
ASSA 2025 Annual Meeting
aeaweb.org
leistenecon.bsky.social
My dad died while I was on the market (albeit during flyout season). Submit applications to anyplace that still allows submissions (even if the deadline has nominally passed). Then reach out to your advisor. Your committee may be able to make some calls to explain your circumstances. Good luck!
leistenecon.bsky.social
If we are talking about this paper, then yes omg what a tour de force
leistenecon.bsky.social
Yeah, I'm all for better frameworks! I'm also sympathetic to everyone who takes a sigh of relief when someone agrees that the market they're studying is plausibly not two-sided