Lenny van Dyck
@levandyck.bsky.social
150 followers 200 following 14 posts
PhD candidate in CogCompNeuro at JLU Giessen Exploring brains, minds, and worlds 🧠💭🗺️ https://levandyck.github.io/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
levandyck.bsky.social
How is high-level visual cortex organized?

In a new preprint with @martinhebart.bsky.social & @kathadobs.bsky.social, we show that category-selective areas encode a rich, multidimensional feature space 🌈

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
#neuroskyence

🧵 1/n
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
jbrendanritchie.bsky.social
Our target discussion article out in Cognitive Neuroscience! It will be followed by peer commentary and our responses. If you would like to write a commentary, please reach out to the journal! 1/18 www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... @cibaker.bsky.social @susanwardle.bsky.social
levandyck.bsky.social
Really looking forward to #CCN2025!

On Tuesday, I'm presenting new work with @kathadobs.bsky.social on segregated vs. integrated face & body processing in visual cortex 😊🧍🧠

Using DNNs & fMRI, we test competing hypotheses, finding both distinct & shared selectivity.

Come by Poster A64 for more.
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
martinhebart.bsky.social
Very much looking forward to #CCN2025! Would love to see you at our lab's talks and posters, and meet me at the panel discussion in the Algonauts session on Wednesday!
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
davidecortinovis.bsky.social
New preprint out! We propose that action is a key dimension shaping the topographic organization of object categories in lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC)—and test whether standard and topographic neural networks capture this pattern. A thread:

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

🧵 1/n
Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks
High-level visual cortex contains category-selective areas embedded within larger-scale topographic maps like animacy and real-world size. Here, we propose action as a key organizing factor shaping vi...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
irisgroen.bsky.social
In these tumultuous times, still happy to report a scientific achievement: our preprint on affordance perception was just published in PNAS!

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Using behavior, fMRI and deep network analyses, we report two key findings. To recapitulate (preprint 🧵lost on other place):
Representation of locomotive action affordances in human behavior, brains, and deep neural networks | PNAS
To decide how to move around the world, we must determine which locomotive actions (e.g., walking, swimming, or climbing) are afforded by the immed...
www.pnas.org
levandyck.bsky.social
Thanks so much, Nick! I just read your latest preprint the other day and already noted it for the next version. Super relevant work :)
levandyck.bsky.social
This work resonates with recent proposals by @meenakshikhosla.bsky.social, @taliakonkle.bsky.social, @jacob-prince.bsky.social, @cibaker.bsky.social, @jbrendanritchie.bsky.social, @olivercontier.bsky.social and many others.

Check out the preprint for details. We’d love to hear your thoughts!

11/11
levandyck.bsky.social
This multidimensional framework supports both discrete category selectivity and continuous feature integration, offering a unified account of high-level visual cortex organization.

10/n
levandyck.bsky.social
So here's our takeaway.

When analyzed in a data-driven manner, the two views aren't mutually exclusive but rather complementary. Individual dimensions form sparse feature-selective clusters but also contribute to distributed maps across cortex.

9/n
levandyck.bsky.social
Individually, they followed a striking topography.

📍 Distinct subclusters within category-selective areas
🌐 But sparsely distributed maps across cortex

Local specialization meets global distribution.

8/n
Functional tuning maps of individual dimensions from category-selective areas across cortex.
levandyck.bsky.social
Collectively, the dimensions from each area explained activity both within their area but also across broader regions of visual cortex.

7/n
Prediction performance of dimensions from category-selective areas across cortex.
levandyck.bsky.social
These dimensions captured diverse information.

🎯 Many aligned with each area’s preferred category (e.g., bodies in EBA)
🧩 Others encoded finer subcategory features (e.g., body parts)
🔄 Some even reflected cross-category distinctions (e.g., food vs. text)

6/n
Interpretability of dimensions in category-selective areas.
levandyck.bsky.social
We found that each area encoded multiple interpretable dimensions, consistent across individuals and primarily tuned to high-level semantic content.

Strikingly, even the most category-selective voxels showed this multidimensional tuning.

5/n
Consistency of dimensions in category-selective areas.
levandyck.bsky.social
To test this, we analyzed fMRI responses to thousands of natural images within classical category-selective areas using a data-driven decomposition approach.

Would the resulting organization look modular, continuous, or like something in between?

4/n
Data-driven fMRI voxel decomposition of category-selective areas.
levandyck.bsky.social
On the other side, a dimensional view argues that it is organized by a continuous feature space with distributed maps spanning across cortex.

Can these seemingly opposing views be reconciled?

3/n
levandyck.bsky.social
During my studies, I got interested in a long-standing debate in visual neuroscience.

On one side, a categorical view holds that high-level visual cortex is composed of discrete modules specialized for domains like faces, bodies, and scenes.

2/n
levandyck.bsky.social
How is high-level visual cortex organized?

In a new preprint with @martinhebart.bsky.social & @kathadobs.bsky.social, we show that category-selective areas encode a rich, multidimensional feature space 🌈

www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
#neuroskyence

🧵 1/n
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
nblauch.bsky.social
What shapes the topography of high-level visual cortex?

Excited to share a new pre-print addressing this question with connectivity-constrained interactive topographic networks, titled "Retinotopic scaffolding of high-level vision", w/ Marlene Behrmann & David Plaut.

🧵 ↓ 1/n
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
hannesmehrer.bsky.social
Announcement: Workshop at #CCN2025
🧠 Modeling the Physical Brain: Spatial Organization & Biophysical Constraints
🗓️ Monday, Aug 11 | 🕦 11:30–18:00 CET | 📍 Room A2.07
🔗 Register: tinyurl.com/CCN-physical...
#NeuroAI @cogcompneuro.bsky.social
Home
tinyurl.com
Reposted by Lenny van Dyck
gretatuckute.bsky.social
What are the organizing dimensions of language processing?

We show that voxel responses during comprehension are organized along 2 main axes: processing difficulty & meaning abstractness—revealing an interpretable, topographic representational basis for language processing shared across individuals