Liana Lareau
@lianafaye.bsky.social
1.6K followers 240 following 54 posts
Assistant Professor of Bioengineering, Berkeley. Living in an RNA world. lareaulab.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
lianafaye.bsky.social
This preprint from Helen Sakharova is one of the coolest things to come out of my lab: “Protein language models reveal evolutionary constraints on synonymous codon choice.” Codon choice is a big puzzle in how information is encoded in genomes, and we have a new angle. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Protein language models reveal evolutionary constraints on synonymous codon choice
Evolution has shaped the genetic code, with subtle pressures leading to preferences for some synonymous codons over others. Codons are translated at different speeds by the ribosome, imposing constrai...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Liana Lareau
lizneeley.bsky.social
Some problems have simple solutions. This new “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” is one. The answer is simply saying no.

Simple does not mean easy. But Brown, Dartmouth, MIT, Vanderbilt, Univ of AZ, UPenn, USC, UT Austin & UVA must understand what they’ll lose if they sign on.
Reposted by Liana Lareau
Reposted by Liana Lareau
agawande.bsky.social
9 CDC Directors going back to 1977 speak out. What RFK Jr has done to our nation’s public health system "should alarm every American."

It "is unlike anything we have ever seen at the agency, and unlike anything our country has ever experienced." www.nytimes.com/2025/09/01/o...
Opinion | We Ran the C.D.C.: Kennedy Is Endangering Every American’s Health
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Liana Lareau
drandrealove.bsky.social
mRNA vaccines are safe, have been in development for decades, & have far broader applications than older vaccine technologies.

New vaccine technologies evolve when scientists have tools & knowledge to make something more elegant or complex that wasn’t possible before.

5/
Reposted by Liana Lareau
Reposted by Liana Lareau
carolynbertozzi.bskyverified.social
Spread the word - we at @stanford-chemh.bsky.social are searching to fill a new junior faculty at the interface of molecular and computational science. See link below!
stanford-chemh.bsky.social
Open faculty position!
We're seeking applicants for a tenure-track faculty position at the junior level (Assistant or untenured Associate Professor) with research programs that exist at the interface between molecular science and computation. Apply here: stanford.io/45MF3Qa
Open Faculty Position: Assistant or Associate (Untenured) Professor 

Application deadline: 11:55 PM on Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Sarafan ChEM-H is seeking candidates with research programs that exist at the interface between molecular science and computation.  

Click the link above to learn more & apply!
Reposted by Liana Lareau
berkeleymcb.bsky.social
We're Hiring! Assistant Professor of Immunology and Molecular Medicine in MCB. Learn more and apply online:
aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF05096
Reposted by Liana Lareau
berkeleymcb.bsky.social
We're Hiring! Assistant Professor of Molecular Therapeutics in MCB. Learn more and apply online:
aprecruit.berkeley.edu/JPF05098
lianafaye.bsky.social
Or rather, the study section was still giving lots of good scores but the grants were just never funded. It was such a waste of so many scientists’ time on both sides.
lianafaye.bsky.social
Was this perhaps an NIGMS-heavy study section implementing their mostly-unannounced policy to pretty much stop funding R01s in favor of R35s (which go to different study sections)?
lianafaye.bsky.social
Yes, it's a discrete counting thing: think about the most extreme log2 fold change numbers you could observe if you start with 100 or 10 or 2 items and end up with 1 item.
Reposted by Liana Lareau
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Would you want to invest in a country where the regime expropriates assets from its opponents?

In related news, "personalist regimes are characterized by lower total factor productivity and ... low private investment, poor public-goods provision, and conflict" www.nber.org/system/files...
Reposted by Liana Lareau
joemcken.net
Science is effectively dead in the US for at least the next 3½ years, and will then take another several years to even get started again. Canceled research doesn’t just uncancel itself, and scientists who find opportunity elsewhere won’t just come flocking back.

The damage is generational.
marklemley.bsky.social
All scientific grant funding must now be approved by a political appointee and "demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities."

I wonder where innovation will happen in the future? It won't be in the US

arstechnica.com/science/2025...
New executive order puts all grants under political control
All new funding on hold until Trump administration can cancel any previously funded grants.
arstechnica.com
lianafaye.bsky.social
That's really interesting - incidentally, we also have some work on how the speed of elongation might feed back on initiation (not in the context of membrane proteins, in this case, and no mechanism yet!). Definitely some interesting possibilities. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Translation elongation as a rate limiting step of protein production
The impact of synonymous codon choice on protein output has important implications for understanding endogenous gene expression and design of synthetic mRNAs. Synonymous codons are decoded at differen...
www.biorxiv.org
Reposted by Liana Lareau
Reposted by Liana Lareau
elizabethjacobs.bsky.social
We are on a bullet train to the end of US science, and possibly the country as a whole, when political appointees are reviewing every scientific grant submitted to NIH to determine if The Regime finds the science acceptable.
lianafaye.bsky.social
In all, how much constraint on synonymous positions? From our model, the equivalent of 9% are predictable (sum of smaller effects on more positions) but that excludes strong overall preferences for fast codons. And 3% is just what we can see in a short competition. So: more than zero, less than all!
lianafaye.bsky.social
At the same time, we made thousands of synonymous mutations in endogenous yeast genes and measured their growth. We used careful statistics and controls. Only 3%, 204 of 6874, had a fitness effect! This goes against a controversial recent result that most synonymous mutations had fitness effects.
Scatterplot showing fitness effect of ~7000 synonymous mutations in yeast: read count at start vs log2 fold change. Most data points are not significant but 204 points are significant outliers, either advantageous or deleterious.
lianafaye.bsky.social
The experiment and our model aligned to highlight localization, especially to the mitochondria. There is interesting biology to pursue there. More broadly, our model works -- and that means that evolutionary forces on proteins shape codon choice in nuanced but real ways.
lianafaye.bsky.social
At the same time, we made thousands of synonymous mutations in endogenous yeast genes and measured their growth. We used careful statistics and controls. Only 3%, 204 of 6874, had a fitness effect! This goes against a controversial recent result that most synonymous mutations had fitness effects.
Scatterplot showing fitness effect of ~7000 synonymous mutations in yeast: read count at start vs log2 fold change. Most data points are not significant but 204 points are significant outliers, either advantageous or deleterious.
lianafaye.bsky.social
So. Yes, information about codons can be pulled out of a model that only saw protein sequence! It predicts slow codons in signal peptides and transit peptides for localization. Fast codons in protein domains and active sites for accuracy. But, no big signal about co-translational protein folding.
A schematic showing that synonymous codon choice affects translation speed, which in turn affects protein output, cotranslational localization, and translation accuracy. A fourth category, cotranslational folding, is greyed out to show it was not a strong finding.
lianafaye.bsky.social
Before we get there, we have to factor out some legit but trivial things. A model can learn that certain types of genes tend to have fast codons or high GC content. We did a lot of work to keep that out of our predictions.
lianafaye.bsky.social
There’s been a lot of exciting work recently using large language models to capture the language of biological sequence. The Evolutionary Scale Model takes every protein ever seen and learns what works and what doesn’t. What if it could predict codon choice without ever seeing a codon?
lianafaye.bsky.social
Like, it might be important to slow down the ribosome so the protein folds properly and doesn’t tangle up. We were looking for signals like that, directly related to translation. (There are also many other ways that sequence matters: mRNA structure, binding sites, etc.)
lianafaye.bsky.social
Synonyms are not identical, in language or in biology. Some synonymous codons are preferred over others, and the preferred ones are decoded more quickly, but they all work, more or less. Where does codon choice really matter?