Wes won't get to the members in a vote? Who would?

No criticism for making the pledge in the first place?

And we know based on Starmer's political project that this is something that he was always going to do

A better way to put it is it's to do with characterisation. This is so clearly the same character, even if the 90s portrayal differed from the 60s and Moore's from Connery's. So is the future characterisation overshadowed by the audience knowing his death?

No idea, but the question reflects a misunderstanding of continuity

Why would it have to be continuous and unbroken? The fact that your protagonist dies in a specific way is so clearly a problem for storytelling of his life

Every report says that they didn't

'Should they move left blah blah, no they need to worry about Reform blah blah' - this stuff is babytalk, they are the government, they need to worry about persistent inflation, poor public services and our exposed public finances:

Is the assumption that it was the right decision from their perspective? It seems to me that Macron came from the centre left, and they could have had a socialist PM and subsequent leader of REM

Why did the Socialists not throw their lot in with Macron?

Never before has football been so freely available (which is really interesting tbh)

Maybe I just look out for it more. It annoys me when people draw a line in a certain way and then think that that's the moral place to draw it!

And Bluesky types flogging their books/articles/conferences

Oh goodness, it's me! Thank you

From an outsider's perspective, I see the soft left as the main group, then Blairites, Labour right, and hard left as dotted around the edges (each having power at different points). However, you've said Labour right is biggest group, which means I haven't understood who they are!

How do we understand the Labour right in the context of the last twenty-odd years?