Prof Lisa Schipper 🌍🍉💪
@lisaschipper.bsky.social
Climate adaptation & development•Prof Development Geography @giubresearch.bsky.social•Co-EiC @climdevjournal.bsky.social•PI @dependencybonn.de•Associate @sei.org & @ecioxford.bsky.social• @welthungerhilfe.bsky.social•she/her/Du•Servant to 3 rescue 🐈⬛ •🇸🇪
Men kan det verkligen vara på riktigt? Verkar lite för desperat och gulligt.
January 20, 2026 at 9:42 AM
Men kan det verkligen vara på riktigt? Verkar lite för desperat och gulligt.
Det är nog det som stör mig mest av allt. Alla kan ju se vad han håller på med. 😵💫
January 20, 2026 at 9:25 AM
Det är nog det som stör mig mest av allt. Alla kan ju se vad han håller på med. 😵💫
She isn’t even good. It’s painful to listen to how much she is trying to make it sound robust.
January 15, 2026 at 6:59 PM
She isn’t even good. It’s painful to listen to how much she is trying to make it sound robust.
Yuck. Yes, really sad. Here we cannot swim in it - too dangerous. High drowning risk, but I guess one would not want to do it anyway
January 13, 2026 at 3:04 PM
Yuck. Yes, really sad. Here we cannot swim in it - too dangerous. High drowning risk, but I guess one would not want to do it anyway
Just had a look...hmm. I guess the point about how the original paper 'unwittingly contributes to the very problem it wants to address' is conveniently ignored.
January 13, 2026 at 8:54 AM
Just had a look...hmm. I guess the point about how the original paper 'unwittingly contributes to the very problem it wants to address' is conveniently ignored.
Yes! I think so 🤓
January 13, 2026 at 5:27 AM
Yes! I think so 🤓
Ooh the story gets juicier! Thanks. Will read later today!
January 13, 2026 at 5:27 AM
Ooh the story gets juicier! Thanks. Will read later today!
...to understand why the critique by Coolsaet et al concludes that 'critically engaging with the processes of knowledge production, as well as acknowledging the existing academic & grassroots contributions for climate research are the first steps towards achieving justice in mitigation.' FIN 8/8
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
...to understand why the critique by Coolsaet et al concludes that 'critically engaging with the processes of knowledge production, as well as acknowledging the existing academic & grassroots contributions for climate research are the first steps towards achieving justice in mitigation.' FIN 8/8
As I often say, you cannot distinguish justice as a research or policy objective from epistemic injustice and knowledge politics - if our research is based on positivist models of Western science, we won't see the real problems - and maybe not even the solutions. I recommend reading both papers...
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
As I often say, you cannot distinguish justice as a research or policy objective from epistemic injustice and knowledge politics - if our research is based on positivist models of Western science, we won't see the real problems - and maybe not even the solutions. I recommend reading both papers...
...it does not engage sufficiently with the deep roots of injustice, nor with literature from radical feminism, political ecology, critical race theory, etc. So the IPCC principles of equity do not either address with this history - and by using them, Zimm et al are indeed 'replicating' the problems
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
...it does not engage sufficiently with the deep roots of injustice, nor with literature from radical feminism, political ecology, critical race theory, etc. So the IPCC principles of equity do not either address with this history - and by using them, Zimm et al are indeed 'replicating' the problems
This is a problem because the IPCC is largely devoid of critical scholars, and due to government pressure, must focus on climate change - for some countries, issues of equity and justice are outside of climate change. So there is a reductionist, instrumentalist tendency in the IPCC, meaning that...
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
This is a problem because the IPCC is largely devoid of critical scholars, and due to government pressure, must focus on climate change - for some countries, issues of equity and justice are outside of climate change. So there is a reductionist, instrumentalist tendency in the IPCC, meaning that...
Why am I bringing this up? Because the Zimm et al paper develops its framework based on 'principles of equity used in IPCC reports to study mitigation effort sharing and remaining emissions quota to illustrate where most of the equity discourse in mitigation scenarios has happened so far'. 4/n
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
Why am I bringing this up? Because the Zimm et al paper develops its framework based on 'principles of equity used in IPCC reports to study mitigation effort sharing and remaining emissions quota to illustrate where most of the equity discourse in mitigation scenarios has happened so far'. 4/n
In response, Coolsaet et al discuss that Zimm et al ignore the history and breadth of environmental justice scholarship - and suggesting that 'the paradox
of the paper by Zimm et al. is that it unwittingly
contributes to the very problem it wants
to address.' 3/n www.nature.com/articles/s41...
of the paper by Zimm et al. is that it unwittingly
contributes to the very problem it wants
to address.' 3/n www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Client Challenge
www.nature.com
January 12, 2026 at 3:01 PM
In response, Coolsaet et al discuss that Zimm et al ignore the history and breadth of environmental justice scholarship - and suggesting that 'the paradox
of the paper by Zimm et al. is that it unwittingly
contributes to the very problem it wants
to address.' 3/n www.nature.com/articles/s41...
of the paper by Zimm et al. is that it unwittingly
contributes to the very problem it wants
to address.' 3/n www.nature.com/articles/s41...